Ki-Chul Park; Kyu-Sung Chung; Joon-Ki Moon

doi:10.12671/jkfs.2012.25.1.13

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 25(1); 2012 > Article

Original Article
Treatment of Distal Femur Fracture with Minimally Invasive Locking Compression Plate Osteosynthesis: Ki-Chul Park, M.D., Kyu-Sung Chung, M.D., Joon-Ki Moon, M.D.; Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2012;25(1):13-19.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2012.25.1.13
Published online: January 31, 2012

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Ki-Chul Park, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of medicine, 249-1, Gyomoon-dong, Guri 471-701, Korea. Tel: 82-31-560-2318, Fax: 82-31-557-8781, kcpark@hanyang.ac.kr

• Received: July 21, 2011 • Revised: October 30, 2011 • Accepted: November 15, 2011

93 Views
0 Download
4 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
To analyze the result of distal femur fracture treatment with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using a locking compression plate (LCP).
Materials and Methods
From December 2004 to April 2010, 33 patients with distal femur fractures were treated by MIPO with a locking compression plate. The reduction state and bone union time was checked radiologically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by the Schatzker and Lambert criteria.
Results
The mean bone union time was 16.3 weeks (10~22 weeks). There were 3 nonunions, 2 broken plates, 1 superficial infection, 7° of valgus angulation in 1 case, and 1.5 cm limb shortening in 1 case. Except for the 3 nonunion cases, according to the Schatzker and Lambert criteria, results were graded as excellent in 11 cases, good in 14 cases, and moderate in 5 cases.
Conclusion
The treatment of distal femoral fracture by MIPO with a locking compression plate resulted in good functional and radiological outcomes, but it has problems, such as broken plates and nonunion. Accurate surgical technique and appropriate treatment will be needed according to fracture type.
Key words: Distal femur fracture, Locking compression plate, Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis

REFERENCES

1. Button G, Wolinsky P, Hak D. Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma, 2004;18:565-570.
2. Collinge CA, Sanders RW. Percutaneous plating in the lower extremity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2000;8:211-216.Article
3. Fankhauser F, Gruber G, Schippinger G, et al. Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (Less Invasive Stabilization System): a prospective study of 30 fractures with a follow up of 20 months. Acta Orthop Scand, 2004;75:56-60.Article
4. Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R, Frenk A, Gilbert S, Schavan R. The development of the distal femur Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). Injury, 2001;32:Suppl 3. SC24-SC31.Article
5. Giles JB, DeLee JC, Heckman JD, Keever JE. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982;64:864-870.Article
6. Han SB, Choi IC, Lee SH, Suh DH, Cho HJ. Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal femoral fracture. J Korean Fract Soc, 2006;19:11-16.Article
7. Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL. Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing? J Orthop Trauma, 2011;25:Suppl 1. S8-S14.Article
8. Henry SL. Supracondylar femur fractures treated percutaneously. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000;(375):51-59.Article
9. Henry SL, Trager S, Green S, Seligson D. Management of supracondylar fractures of the femur with the GSH intramedullary nail: preliminary report. Contemp Orthop, 1991;22:631-640.
10. Kayali C, Agus H, Turgut A. Successful results of minimally invasive surgery for comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures with LISS: comparative study of multiply injured and isolated femoral fractures. J Orthop Sci, 2007;12:458-465.Article
11. Khan MI. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1983;65:135-136.Article
12. Kim SJ, Oh CW, Jeon IH, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal femoral fractures. J Korean Soc Fract, 2003;16:474-481.Article
13. Koval KJ, Hoehl JJ, Kummer FJ, Simon JA. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of the standard condylar buttress plate, a locked buttress plate, and the 95-degree blade plate. J Orthop Trauma, 1997;11:521-524.Article
14. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Alonso J. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury, 2001;32:Suppl 3. SC32-SC47.Article
15. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2004;18:509-520.
16. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Bertram R, Holmes W, Tscherne H. Transarticular joint reconstruction and indirect plate osteosynthesis for complex distal supracondylar femoral fractures. Injury, 1997;28:Suppl 1. A31-A41.Article
17. Lucas SE, Seligson D, Henry SL. Intramedullary supracondylar nailing of femoral fractures. A preliminary report of the GSH supracondylar nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993;(296):200-206.
18. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N. Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004;(426):252-257.
19. Neer CS 2nd, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1967;49:591-613.
20. Ostrum RF, Geel C. Indirect reduction and internal fixation of supracondylar femur fractures without bone graft. J Orthop Trauma, 1995;9:278-284.Article
21. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002;84:1093-1110.
22. Schatzker J, Home G, Waddell J. The Toronto experience with the supracondylar fracture of the femur, 1966-72. Injury, 1974;6:113-128.Article
23. Schatzker J, Lambert DC. Supracondylar fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1979;(138):77-83.Article
24. Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C, et al. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury, 2001;32:Suppl 3. SC48-SC54.
25. Schütz M, Müller M, Regazzoni P, et al. Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2005;125:102-108.
26. Vallier HA, Hennessey TA, Sontich JK, Patterson BM, et al. Failure of LCP condylar plate fixation in the distal part of the femur. A report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006;88:846-853.Article
27. Wong MK, Leung F, Chow SP. Treatment of distal femoral fractures in the elderly using a less-invasive plating technique. Int Orthop, 2005;29:117-120.

Fig. 1

(A, B) A 66-year-old woman with communited, distal femur fracture by traffic accident (AO-OTA classification 32-C1).

(C, D) Radiographs show a postoperative state which is reduced and internal fixation.

(E, F) Follow-up radiographs after 6 months show bony union with good alignment.

(G, H) Clinical photographs after 6 months show nearly full range of motion on knee joint.

Fig. 2

(A, B) A 57-year-old man with extraarticular metaphyseal fragmented wedge, distal femur fracture injured by traffic accident (AO-OTA classification 33-A2).

(C, D) Radiographs show a postoperative state which is reduced and internal fixation.

(E, F) Follow-up radiographs after 20 weeks show a nonunion state.

(G, H) Radiographs show a second operation state via removal of previous implant, autogenous iliac bone graft and reimplantation.

(I, J) Follow-up radiographs after 4 months from second operation show bony union.

Table 1

Comparison of clinical outcomes

^*Fisher exact test.

Table 2

Patient demographics, clinical and radiographic outcomes

ROM: Range of motion, AP: Anteriorposterior, Lat: Lateral.

Table 3

The Schazker and Lambert criteria

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Surgical Treatment of AO/OTA 33-C Intra-Articular Distal Femoral Fractures through Parapatellar Approach
Suk Kyu Choo, Sung Tan Cho, Hyoung Keun Oh
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2022; 35(1): 1. CrossRef
Comparing Outcomes of Retrograde Intramedullary Nail and Locking Plate Fixation in Distal Femoral Fractures
Byung-Ho Yoon, Bo Kwon Hwang, Hyoung-Keun Oh, Suk Kyu Choo, Jong Min Sohn, Yerl-Bo Sung
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2021; 34(4): 131. CrossRef
Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis
Byung-Ho Yoon, In Keun Park, Youngwoo Kim, Hyoung-Keun Oh, Suk Kyu Choo, Yerl-Bo Sung
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2021; 141(2): 225. CrossRef
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis with Locking Compression Plate for Distal Femur Fracture
Sung Won Cho, Sang Ho Ha, Gwang Chul Lee, Woong Hee Kim
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(3): 205. CrossRef

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Treatment of Distal Femur Fracture with Minimally Invasive Locking Compression Plate Osteosynthesis

J Korean Fract Soc. 2012;25(1):13-19. Published online January 31, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2012.25.1.13

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

Related articles

Bone Union Time of Simple Distal Femur Fractures in the Elderly according to Fracture Gap after Treated with Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis

Treatment of Distal Femur Fracture with Minimally Invasive Locking Compression Plate Osteosynthesis

Fig. 1 (A, B) A 66-year-old woman with communited, distal femur fracture by traffic accident (AO-OTA classification 32-C1). (C, D) Radiographs show a postoperative state which is reduced and internal fixation. (E, F) Follow-up radiographs after 6 months show bony union with good alignment. (G, H) Clinical photographs after 6 months show nearly full range of motion on knee joint.

Fig. 2 (A, B) A 57-year-old man with extraarticular metaphyseal fragmented wedge, distal femur fracture injured by traffic accident (AO-OTA classification 33-A2). (C, D) Radiographs show a postoperative state which is reduced and internal fixation. (E, F) Follow-up radiographs after 20 weeks show a nonunion state. (G, H) Radiographs show a second operation state via removal of previous implant, autogenous iliac bone graft and reimplantation. (I, J) Follow-up radiographs after 4 months from second operation show bony union.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Treatment of Distal Femur Fracture with Minimally Invasive Locking Compression Plate Osteosynthesis

Table 1

Comparison of clinical outcomes

^*Fisher exact test.

Table 2

Patient demographics, clinical and radiographic outcomes

ROM: Range of motion, AP: Anteriorposterior, Lat: Lateral.

Table 3

The Schazker and Lambert criteria

Table 1 Comparison of clinical outcomes

^*Fisher exact test.

Table 2 Patient demographics, clinical and radiographic outcomes

ROM: Range of motion, AP: Anteriorposterior, Lat: Lateral.

Table 3 The Schazker and Lambert criteria