Background The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of a small single or double low-profile plate fixation of 2.0/2.4 mm locking compression plate (LCP) in treating isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures of the humerus. Methods: From June 2015 to October 2022, patients who underwent LCP in treating isolated GT fractures of the humerus were included in this study. The radiological and clinical results were analyzed in 15 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation used 2.0/2.4 mm LCP. Results: Bone union was achieved in 14 patients (93.3%) and one failed case was treated with a 2.4 mm single LCP fixation. Radiological union was achieved within 10–20 weeks. Complications occurred in two patients (13.3%), including the reduction failure and shoulder stiffness. At the final follow-up, the average clinical scores were as follows: a visual analog scale for pain of 2.1 (range, 0–5) and a University of California, Los Angeles score of 27.2 (range, 18–31). Regarding range of motion (ROM), the average active ROMs were 142° for forward flexion (range, 120°–150°), 147.1° for abduction (range, 120°– 180°), and 59.3° for external rotation (range, 45°–80°). For internal rotation, the average was observed to reach the 10th thoracic vertebra (range, 1st lumbar vertebra–7th thoracic vertebra). Conclusions: The clinical and radiologic outcomes of treating isolated GT fracture using 2.0/2.4 mm LCP were favorable, and double low-profile plate fixation may be beneficial for sufficient fracture stability if possible. Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.
PURPOSE This study examined clinical outcomes of Monteggia fracture type 2, which is the most common in adults with a high rate of accompanied injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS From June 2004 to November 2015, a retrospective study was performed on 12 patients diagnosed with Monteggia fracture type 2 with a follow-up period of at least 6 months after surgery. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and the existence of accompanied injures, radiological result, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS Posterior instability was confirmed in all patients and accompanied fractures were detected in 9 patients (75.0%) on the radial head, whereas 10 patients (83.3%) were found on the coronoid process. The average arc of motion was 107° (70°–130°) and the mean MEPS was 89 (45–100). Additional re-operation due to re-dislocation, radioulnar synostosis, elbow instability, ulna nonunion, and radial head nonunion were performed in 4 cases (33.3%). CONCLUSION The Monteggia fracture type 2 is more commonly associated with radial head fractures and coronoid process fractures rather than other types, which causes elbow instability. Because the rate of additional surgery due to complications is high, the treatment of Monteggia fracture type 2 requires careful assessments.
Generally, lateral plating is used for a comminuted fracture of the distal femur. However, in some cases, it has been shown that using a medial plate is necessary to achieve better outcome. Nevertheless, there are no available anatomical plates that fit either the distal medial femoral condyle or fracture fixation, except for the relatively short plate developed for distal femoral osteotomy. We found that locking compression plate-proximal lateral tibia (LCP-PLT) fits anatomically well for the contour of the ipsilateral medial femoral condyle. Moreover, LCP-PLT has less risk of breaking the thread holes since it rarely needs to be bent. We report a plastic bone model study and two cases of distal femoral fractures fixed with medial plating using LCP-PLT.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A novel anatomical locked medial femoral condyle plate: a biomechanical study M. A. Ozer, S. Keser, D. Barıs, O. Yazoglu European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2024; 34(5): 2767. CrossRef
Medial plating of distal femur: which pre-contoured angular stable plate fits best? Shaam Achudan, Rex Premchand Antony Xavier, Sze Ern Tan European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2024; 34(6): 3297. CrossRef
Medial augmentation of distal femur fractures using the contralateral distal femur locking plate: A technical note Jaime Andrés Leal OTA International.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The missing piece of the trauma armoury-medial femoral condyle plate Piyush Upadhyay, Farhan Syed, Darryl N Ramoutar, Jayne Ward Injury.2022; 53(3): 1237. CrossRef
Surgical Tips and Tricks for Distal Femur Plating Christopher Lee, Dane Brodke, Ajay Gurbani Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Medial minimally invasive helical plate osteosynthesis of the distal femur – a new technique G.M. Hohenberger, A.M. Schwarz, P. Grechenig, B. Clement, Mario Staresinic, Bore Bakota Injury.2021; 52: S27. CrossRef
Feature-Based Design of Personalized Anatomical Plates for the Treatment of Femoral Fractures Xiaozhong Chen, Zhijian Mao, Xi Jiang IEEE Access.2021; 9: 43824. CrossRef
Although studies on malrotation of the humerus possibly leading to dysfunction of the shoulder have been reported, studies on its causes are inadequate. The authors encountered a patient complaining of malrotation accompanied by dysfunction of the shoulder which occurred during treatment of a distal humeral fracture. The patient recovered the shoulder function by only correcting malrotation of the humerus without direct treatment on the shoulder, and we report it herein with a review of the literature.