Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Original Articles

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Internal Fixation with Reconstruction Plate Versus Anatomical Locking Compression Plate in Displaced Intercondylar Fractures of Humerus: Tong Joo Lee, Young Tae Kim, Dae Gyu Kwon, Ju Yong Park; J Korean Fract Soc 2014;27(4):294-300. Published online October 31, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2014.27.4.294

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To analyze the clinical result of a conventional reconstruction plate (CRP) fixation and locking compressive plate (LCP) fixation on the surgical treatment of an adult's displaced intercondylar fracture of humerus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 40 patients enrolled in the study were treated between August 2002 and May 2012. Fixation with a CRP was performed in 20 patients (group A) and anatomical locking compression plate fixation was performed in 20 patients (group B). The clinical and functional evaluation was performed according to the Mayo elbow performance score and Cassebaum classification of elbow range of motion (ROM), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score.
RESULTS
The Mayo elbow functional evaluation scores, eight cases were excellent, 10 cases were good, and two cases were fair in group A, and 12 cases were excellent, seven cases good, and one case fair in group B; both groups showed satisfactory results. The durations of attaining 90 to 120 degrees of the ROM of joints postoperatively were 8.3 days on average (6 to 15 days) in group A and 5.5 days on average (5 to 9 days) in group B, demonstrating a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.04). Although the correlations of clinical results according to the difference of bone mineral densities (BMDs) were not statistically significant between the two groups (p=0.35), loss of fixation occurred due to loosening of screws in two patients with low BMDs in whose operations reconstruction plates were used.
CONCLUSION
The use of locking compressive plate on the surgical treatment of an diaplaced intercondylar fracture of humerus have a good clinical results because that permits early rehabilitation through good fixation and reduces the complications such as loosening of screws.

25 View
0 Download

Coracoclavicular Screw Fixation and Tension Band Wiring in Treatment of Distal Clavicle Fracture: Dae Gyu Kwon, Tong Joo Lee, Kyung Ho Moon, Byoung Ki Shin, Min Su Woo; J Korean Fract Soc 2013;26(1):1-7. Published online January 31, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2013.26.1.1

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of coracoclavicular screw fixation with tension band wiring in the treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From October 2006 to December 2010, 18 patients with Neer type 2 displaced distal clavicle fracture were surgically treated. Fixation was performed, using coracoclavicular screw with tension band wiring. Radiographic and clinical evaluation was performed and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale was employed for the assessment of shoulder joint function.
RESULTS
Osseous union was achieved approximately 9.5 weeks (8-11 weeks) in all patients. After the union, the screw and wire were removed under local anesthesia. All patients returned to the normal shoulder range of motion. Loosening of the screw was seen in two patients and breakage was seen in one patient. However, we could not observe the delayed union and complications, such as infection and refracture. All but one patient showed excellent results according to the UCLA shoulder score at one year after the operation.
CONCLUSION
Coracoclavicular screw fixation with tension band wiring in the treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures is a clinically useful technique with good result and less complication.

33 View
0 Download

Combined Anterolateral and Lateral Approaches in Treatment of Extra-articular Fracture of the Distal Humerus: Dae Gyu Kwon, Kyoung Ho Moon, Suk In Na, Byung Ki Shin, Tong Joo Lee; J Korean Fract Soc 2012;25(3):185-190. Published online July 31, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2012.25.3.185

Abstract PDF

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical effectiveness of open reduction in the treatment of distal humeral fracture using a newly designed combined approach of anterolateral and lateral approaches to protect the radial nerve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We investigated 24 consecutive cases of distal humeral fracture who received open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screws with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. We analyzed the patients' age, sex, fracture pattern, timing of the union, range of motion of the elbow joint, and complications. The Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI) was employed for the assessment of elbow joint function.
RESULTS
Clinical union was observed at 10.8 weeks (6~20 weeks) on average. Pre-operatively, there were 3 cases of incomplete radial nerve palsy. All of the cases recovered, and there was no additional radial nerve palsy due to surgery. According to the MEPI, 13 cases were "excellent" and 10 cases were "good" or better, comprising 95.83% of the cases. The range of motion at the elbow was 5.5 degrees (0~15 degrees) of extension, and 131.5 degrees (120~145 degrees) of flexion, suggesting no functional disability. The duration of return to work was 11.2 weeks (5~32 weeks) on average. There were no nonunion, malunion, or infection complications.
CONCLUSION
The combined anterolateral and lateral approach we designed is a clinically effective approach due to facilitation of protection of the radial nerve and attainment of adequate fixation space.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Posterior Dual Plating for Distal Shaft Fractures of the Humerus
Chul-Hyun Cho, Kwang-Yeung Jeong, Beom-Soo Kim
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2017; 30(3): 117. CrossRef
Modified Combined Approach for Distal Humerus Shaft Fracture: Anterolateral and Lateral Bimodal Approach
Tong Joo Lee, Dae Gyu Kwon, Suk In Na, Seung Do Cha
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2013; 5(3): 209. CrossRef

30 View
0 Download
2 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search