REFERENCES

• 1. Kakuk P. The legacy of the Hwang case: research misconduct in biosciences. Sci Eng Ethics, 2009;15:545-562.
• 2. Hvistendahl M. Science for sale: inflated collaboration claims--response. Science, 2014;343:612.
• 3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The new ICMJE recommendations (August 2013) [Internet], International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2013;cited 2014 Aug 20. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/new_rec_aug2013.html/
• 4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ethical considerations in the conduct andreporting of research. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication [Internet], International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2008;cited 2014 Aug 20. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/archives/2008_urm.pdf/
• 5. Shaw D. The ICMJE's definition of authorship is illogical and unethical. BMJ, 2011;343:d7192.
• 6. Stephenson J. ICMJE: all authors of medical journal articles have "responsibility to stand by the integrity of the entire work". JAMA. 2013.310: p. 1216.
• 7. Albert T, Wager L. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers [Internet], Committee on Publication Ethics. 2003;Available from: The COPE Report 2003http://publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12.pdf/
• 8. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. Good publication practice guidelines for medical journals. 2nd ed. Seoul: KAMJE; 2013.
• 9. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Kulkarni AV, et al. Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014;67:1049-1054.
• 10. Brennan PM, Jubb A, Baillie JK, Partridge RW. Deciding authorship order. BMJ, 2013;347:f7182.
• 11. Ebrahimpour M, Putniņš TJ, Berryman MJ, Allison A, Ng BW, Abbott D. Automated authorship attribution using advanced signal classification techniques. PLoS One, 2013;8:e54998.
• 12. Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jerončić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One, 2011;6:e23477.
• 13. Slone RM. Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996;167:571-579.
• 14. Mowatt G, Shirran L, Grimshaw JM, et al. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. JAMA, 2002;287:2769-2771.
• 15. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA, 1998;280:222-224.
• 16. Bonekamp S, Halappa VG, Corona-Villalobos CP, et al. Prevalence of honorary coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012;198:1247-1255.
• 17. Greenland P, Fontanarosa PB. Ending honorary authorship. Science, 2012;337:1019.
• 18. Abbasi K. Transparency and trust. BMJ, 2004;329.
• 19. Collier R. Prevalence of ghostwriting spurs calls for transparency. CMAJ, 2009;181:E161-E162.
• 20. Healy D, Cattell D. Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics. Br J Psychiatry, 2003;183:22-27.
• 21. PLoS Medicine Editors. Ghostwriting: the dirty little secret of medical publishing that just got bigger. PLoS Med, 2009;6:e1000156.
• 22. Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ, 2011;343:d6128.
• 23. Matheson A. How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship--and how they should be revised. PLoS Med, 2011;8:e1001072.
• 24. Stretton S. Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature. BMJ Open, 2014;4:e004777.
• 25. McDonald RJ, Neff KL, Rethlefsen ML, Kallmes DF. Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends. Mayo Clin Proc, 2010;85:920-927.
• 26. Lok AS. Authorship: who should be included and how should it be determined? Gastroenterology, 2011;141:786-788.
• 27. Eggert LD. Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles. Front Psychol, 2011;2:196.
• 28. Dance A. Authorship: who's on first? Nature, 2012;489:591-593.
• 29. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. Flowcharts: what to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication [Internet], Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. 2013;cited 2014 Aug 19. Available from: http://kamje.or.kr/COPE-flow-chart-KO.pdf/.Korean
• 30. Committee on Publication Ethics. Flowcharts: what to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication [Internet], Committee on Publication Ethics. 2008;cited 2014 Aug 19. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts/
• 31. ORCID Inc.ORCID connecting research and researchers. What is ORCID? [Internet], Bethesda, ORCID inc.. cited 2014 Aug 12. Available from: https://orcid.org/content/initiative

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by