Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
10 "Distal tibia fracture"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Comparison of a Novel Box-Frame External Fixator and Conventional Delta-Frame External Fixator in the Staged Treatment of Distal Tibia Fractures
Yong-Cheol Yoon, MinKyu Shin, Chang-Wug Oh, Jong-Keon Oh
J Korean Fract Soc 2020;33(3):125-133.   Published online July 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.3.125
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Distal tibia fractures with severe soft-tissue edema or intra-articular fractures are treated by staged operations using external fixators. Definitive surgery that maintains ligamentotaxis has been difficult using existing fixators. This study introduced a novel ‘box-frame’ external fixator and evaluated its clinical usefulness.
Materials and Methods
This study included 45 patients (32 males, 13 females) diagnosed with distal tibia fractures who underwent staged operations between March 2012 and March 2016, with a follow-up of at least one year. The patients were divided into two groups. In one group, fixation was performed with a box-frame external fixator (Group A). In the other group, fixation was performed with a delta-frame external fixator (Group B). The following outcomes were evaluated: the time until definitive surgery, operative time of the definitive surgery, radiation exposure time, bone union, time to achieve bone union, postsurgical complications, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society anklehindfoot score, and ankle range of motion.
Results
Compared to the delta-frame, the box-frame showed a statistically significant reduction in the mean radiation-exposure time and operative time during the definitive surgery by 58 seconds and 25 minutes, respectively. The differences in the time until definitive surgery, bone union, time to achieve bone union, postsurgical complications, and functional scores were not significant.
Conclusion
The box-frame external fixator can be a useful treatment method in the staged surgery of distal tibia fractures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Temporary Circular External Fixation for Spanning the Traumatized Ankle Joint
    Nando Ferreira, Niel Bruwer, Adriaan Jansen van Rensburg, Ernest Muserere, Shao-Ting Jerry Tsang
    JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Temporary circular external fixation for spanning the traumatised ankle joint: A cohort comparison study
    William D. Harrison, Franklin Fortuin, Matthieu Durand-Hill, Etienne Joubert, Nando Ferreira
    Injury.2022; 53(10): 3525.     CrossRef
  • 169 View
  • 3 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
The Result of Using an Additional Mini-Locking Plate for Tibial Pilon Fractures
Suenghwan Jo, Jun Young Lee, Boseon Kim, Kang Hyeon Ryu
J Korean Fract Soc 2017;30(2):75-82.   Published online April 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2017.30.2.75
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We evaluated the usefulness of an additional, 2.7 mm mini-locking plate for tibial pilon fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We studied 21 patients (14 males and 7 females), who were treated with a 2.7 mm mini-locking plate via the anterolateral approach for tibial pilon fractures between September 2012 and April 2014. The mean age was 43.85 years, and the mean follow-up period was 16.6 months. The radiologic outcomes were graded by the Burwell and Charnley modified system and clinical outcomes were evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind foot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score.
RESULTS
The mean union period was 14.3 weeks. At the final follow-up, radiologic results showed 16 excellent results, 4 fair results, and 1 poor result. The average VAS was 3.4 points; the average AOFAS score was 81.8 points. During the follow-up period, there were three cases of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and one case of superficial skin infection.
CONCLUSION
Additional anterolateral, 2.7 mm mini-locking plate may be a good treatment method to manage tibial pilon fractures.
  • 119 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Analysis of the Result Treated with Locking Compression Plate-Distal Tibia and Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate in Distal Tibia Fracture
Jun Young Lee, Sang Ho Ha, Sung Won Cho, Sung Hae Park
J Korean Fract Soc 2013;26(2):118-125.   Published online April 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2013.26.2.118
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of minimally invasive plate, osteosynthesis, using either a locking compression plate-distal tibia (LCP-DT) or Zimmer periarticular locking plate (ZPLP) for distal tibia fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty one patients (51 cases), who underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis using locking compression plate for distal tibia fractures between October 2008 and August 2011, were followed for more than six months. Eighteen patients were treated with LCP-DT and 33 patients with ZPLP. Time to bony union and anatomic alignment were evaluated radiologically. Clinically, American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scales (AOFAS score) and range of ankle motion were assessed and compared between two groups.
RESULTS
All patients achieved bony union at an average of 18 weeks on LCP-DT group and 16weeks on ZPLP group. The average American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scales was 83.3 points on the LCP-DT group, 84.6 points on the ZPLP group, and range of ankle motion averaged at 45 degrees, 48 degrees, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both types of locking compression plates were effective when performing minimally invasive osteosynthesis for distal tibia fractures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Biomechanical analysis and clinical effects of bridge combined fixation system for femoral fractures
    Da-xing Wang, Ying Xiong, Hong Deng, Fu Jia, Shao Gu, Bai-lian Liu, Qun-hui Li, Qi Pu, Zhong-zi Zhang
    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine.2014; 228(9): 899.     CrossRef
  • 82 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Outcomes of Locking Compression Plate Fixation through Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Distal Tibia Fracture
Jae Sung Yoo, Hyun Woo Park
J Korean Fract Soc 2012;25(2):117-122.   Published online April 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2012.25.2.117
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To analyze the clinical results of operative treatment of distal tibia fracture with locking compression plate fixation through a minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The subjects were 46 patients (conventional open surgery: 22 patients, minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis: 24 patients) with fracture of the distal tibia who were treated with plating between November 2006 and June 2010. The time of bony union, complications, range of motion, and clinical functional outcome (according to American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, AOFAS) were investigated.
RESULTS
In the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis group, the average union time was 14.3 weeks, postoperative range of motion was an average of 55.2, average AOFAS was 96.9, and incidence of complications was 20.8%. In the open surgery group, the average union time was 18.9 weeks, postoperative range of motion was an average of 49.1, average AOFAS was 83.8, and incidence of complications was 32.6%. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Surgical treatment with locking compression plate fixation through the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis technique showed favorable results regarding its union time, postoperative functional outcome, and incidence of complications. The locking compression plate fixation through minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis technique can be an effective treatment option.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Fractures of Distal Tibia
    Tae Hun Kim, So Hak Chung
    Kosin Medical Journal.2014; 29(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • 77 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with Locking Compression Plate for Distal Tibia Fractures
Sung Kyu Kim, Keun Bae Lee, Keun Young Lim, Eun Sun Moon
J Korean Fract Soc 2011;24(1):33-40.   Published online January 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2011.24.1.33
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To evaluate the outcome of minimally invasive osteosynthesis using locking compression plate for distal tibia fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty five patients (45 cases) who underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis using locking compression plate for distal tibia fractures between January 2006 and June 2008, were followed for more than one year. The average duration of the follow-up was 30.5 months (12~54 months). The fracture types were as followed: 26 cases (58%) of extraarticular fractures, 19 cases (42%) of intraarticular fractures, and 16 cases (36%) of open fractures.
RESULTS
All patients achieved bone union at average of 21weeks (12~36 weeks). The average American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scales was 84.6 points (65~100 points) and range of ankle motion averaged at 46.5 degrees (20~60 degrees). Complications included 6 cases of superficial infection, 3 cases of malalignment and 5 cases of skin irritation by plate. There were no cases of deep infection, skin necrosis, shortening and metal breakage.
CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive osteosynthesis using locking compression plate for distal tibia fractures is considered to be an effective method with high healing rate, rapid functional recovery and low complication rate due to minimal disruption of bone and soft tissue biology and improved fixation strength.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Tibial Fractures Using an Anterolateral Locking Plate
    Dongwhan Suh, Hwan Hee Lee, Young Hoon Han, Jae Jung Jeong
    Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society.2020; 24(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis and Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of the Distal Tibia Fractures
    Ho-Min Lee, Young-Sung Kim, Jong-Pil Kim, Phil-Hyun Chung, Suk Kang, Kaung Suk Jo
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2018; 31(3): 94.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the Results between Intramedullary Nailing and Plate Fixation for Distal Tibia Fractures
    Jung-Han Kim, Heui-Chul Gwak, Chang-Rack Lee, Yang-Hwan Jung
    Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society.2015; 19(3): 86.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Fractures of Distal Tibia
    Tae Hun Kim, So Hak Chung
    Kosin Medical Journal.2014; 29(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • 73 View
  • 0 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Comparative Study Using of Treatment with Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Using Periarticular Plate and Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing in Distal Tibia Fractures
Chang Hwa Hong, Jong Seok Park, Sang Seon Lee, Soo Ik Awe, Woo Jong Kim, Ki Jin Jung
J Korean Fract Soc 2010;23(3):296-302.   Published online July 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2010.23.3.296
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To compare the result of treatment between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using periarticular plate and intramedullary nailing in treatment of distal tibia fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
28 cases of distal tibia fractures form Jan. 2006 to Mar. 2008 were divided into two group. Minimum follow-up was for 12 month. Group 1 consisted of 14 patients who were treated by MIPO technique and group 2 consisted of 14 patients who were treated by interlocking intramedullary nailing. The results were compared by assessing radiologic and clinical result.
RESULTS
The mean bony union time was 14 weeks (8~17) in group 1 and 15 weeks (11~20) in group 2. Operation time was 58 minutes (55~65) in group 1 and 82.7 minutes (70~100) in group 2. The average angulation in AP view was 1.5 degrees (0~2) in group 1 and 2 degrees (0~5) in group 2, in lateral view was 1.8 degrees (0~4) in group 1 and 2.3 degrees (0~12) in group 2. The average range of motion for dorsi flextion was 17.5 degrees (15~20) in group 1 and 18 degrees (16~20) in group 2, for plantar flextion was 45 degrees (42~50) in group 1 and 44 degrees (42~50) in group 2, which means that there were no severe limitation of motion in all patients, resulting in satisfactory ambulation. There was no post operative complications such as skin irritation problem caused by internal device and no implant failure and superficial wound infection.
CONCLUSION
There were no difference in bony union time, clinical result and anatomical reduction between Group 1 and Group 2 in distal tibia fractures, but operation time was shorter in MIPO than nailing.
  • 101 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
A Comparison between Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis & Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing in Distal Tibia Fractures
Kee Byung Lee, Si Young Song, Duek Joo Kwon, Yong Beom Lee, Nam Kyou Rhee, Jun Ha Choi
J Korean Fract Soc 2008;21(4):286-291.   Published online October 31, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2008.21.4.286
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To compare the effectiveness between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and interlocking IM nailing in the treatment of distal tibia fracture without involvement of ankle joint retrospectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
38 patients with distal tibia fracture from Jan. 2004 to Oct. 2005 were divided into two groups. Minimum follow-up was for 12 months. Group MIPO consisted of 18 patients were treated with MIPO and group Nail consisted of 20 patients were treated with interlocking intramedullary nail. The results were compared between two groups by assessing bony union time and operation time. Clinical evaluation was evaluated by Olerud score.
RESULTS
The mean bony union time was 14.4 weeks (12~17 weeks) in group MIPO and 16.7 weeks (13~19 weeks) in group Nail (p=0.011). The mean operation time was 1.05 hours (0.6~1.6 hours) in group MIPO and 0.74 hours (0.4~1.1 hours) in group Nail (p=0.044). The Olerud score was 83.8 (75~100) in group MIPO and was 89.6 (70~100) in group Nail (p=0.075). In Complication, group MIPO showed one metal failure and two skin irritations, group Nail showed three superficial wound infections.
CONCLUSION
MIPO was the shorter bony union time and the longer operation time than the interlocking intramedullary nailing. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical results.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis and Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of the Distal Tibia Fractures
    Ho-Min Lee, Young-Sung Kim, Jong-Pil Kim, Phil-Hyun Chung, Suk Kang, Kaung Suk Jo
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2018; 31(3): 94.     CrossRef
  • A Rehabilitation for Ankle Fracture in Korean Medicine: A Report of 4 Cases
    Won-Bae Ha, Jong-Ha Lee, Yoon-Seung Lee, Dong-Chan Jo, Jin-Hyun Lee, Jung-Han Lee
    Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation.2017; 27(4): 171.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the Results between Intramedullary Nailing and Plate Fixation for Distal Tibia Fractures
    Jung-Han Kim, Heui-Chul Gwak, Chang-Rack Lee, Yang-Hwan Jung
    Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society.2015; 19(3): 86.     CrossRef
  • Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibial Fractures with Percutaneous Reduction by Pointed Reduction Forceps
    Jae-Kwang Hwang, Chung-Hwan Kim, Young-Joon Choi, Gi-Won Lee, Hyun-Il Lee, Tae-Kyung Kim
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2014; 27(2): 144.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of the Results between Intramedullary Nailing and Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Tibia Fractures
    Chul-Hyun Park, Chi-Bum Choi, Bum-Jin Shim, Dong-Chul Lee, Oog-Jin Shon
    Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2014; 49(4): 285.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the Result Treated with Locking Compression Plate-Distal Tibia and Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate in Distal Tibia Fracture
    Jun-Young Lee, Sang-Ho Ha, Sung-Won Cho, Sung-Hae Park
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(2): 118.     CrossRef
  • 114 View
  • 0 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Comparative Study of Intramedullary Nailing and Plate for Metaphyseal Fractures of the Distal Tibia
Hoon Jeong, Jae Doo Yoo, Young Do Koh, Hoon Sang Sohn
J Korean Fract Soc 2007;20(2):154-160.   Published online April 30, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2007.20.2.154
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To compare the radiological and clinical results between intramedullary nailing and plate fixation in the treatment of distal tibial fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
19 cases of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures within 4 cm of the ankle joint line were enrolled. Ten patients were treated with interlocking intramedullary nail and the others with plate and screws.
RESULTS
The mean union time was 14 weeks in nailing group and 16 weeks in plate group. The average angulation in AP view was 4.1 degrees in nailing group and 3.1 degrees in plate group. The average angulation in lateral view was 1.7 degrees in nailing group and 2.7 degrees in plate group. The rotational deformity was 2.8 degrees in nailing group and 1.7 degrees in plate group in average. There was no implant failure and soft tissue problem.
CONCLUSION
There was no difference in clinical and radiological results between intramedullary nailing and plate in the treatment of the distal tibial fractures and, considering the preservation of the soft tissue, the intramedullary nails are a reliable method for managing distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Does a Customized 3D Printing Plate Based on Virtual Reduction Facilitate the Restoration of Original Anatomy in Fractures?
    Seung-Han Shin, Moo-Sub Kim, Do-Kun Yoon, Jae-Jin Lee, Yang-Guk Chung
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(6): 927.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of the Results between Intramedullary Nailing and Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Tibia Fractures
    Chul-Hyun Park, Chi-Bum Choi, Bum-Jin Shim, Dong-Chul Lee, Oog-Jin Shon
    Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2014; 49(4): 285.     CrossRef
  • 67 View
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
The Comparison of MIPPO vs Open Plate Fixation in the Treatment of the Distal Tibia Fracture
Seong Ho Yoo, Seong Jun Ahn, Moo Ho Song, Bu Hwan Kim, Min Soo Lee, Jong Ha Park
J Korean Fract Soc 2006;19(1):29-33.   Published online January 31, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2006.19.1.29
AbstractAbstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of the surgical treatment through the comparison of MIPPO vs open plate fixation in the treatment of the distal tibia fracture retrospectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
30 patients with distal tibia fracture from Jun. 2001 to Jun. 2004 were divided into two groups depending on the surgical method. Minimum follow up was 12 months. Group A consisted of 15 patients treated with MIPPO, Group B was 15 patients treated with open plate fixation. The clinical outcomes were evaluated retrospectively from operation time, rehabilitation, ROM, interval change of postoperative CRP to assess postoperative inflammatory reaction, postoperative complications and clinical result with the use of McLennan and Ungersma criteria.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in clinical result by McLennan and Ungersma criteria in both groups. The postoperative 3 days and 7 days CRP were 4.0mg% (0.9~7.2)/0.5 mg% (0.1~1.5) in group A and 7.97mg% (2.8~14.6)/1.0mg% (0.3~1.6) in group B, shows more minimal tissue injury and early recovery in group A. Operation time in group A was shorter than group B. Normal recovery of ROM was quicker in Group A. In complications, group A showed one superficial infection and one angular deformity and group B showed one superficial infection, one infected nonunion and two ankle stiffness.
CONCLUSION
There were no significant differences in clinical result and bony union. MIPPO technique is superior to group B in view of the minimal tissue injury, complications, operation time and postoperative rehabilitation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Using a Lateral Plate in Distal Tibial Fracture
    Oog Jin Shon, Dae Sung Kim
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • 71 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical study of may anatomical bone plate in distal tibial fractures
Seung Gyun Cha, Won Seuk Lee, Oue Joong Kim, Jin Hak Kim
J Korean Soc Fract 1991;4(1):94-99.   Published online May 31, 1991
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1991.4.1.94
AbstractAbstract PDF
No abstract available.
  • 84 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
Close layer
TOP