REFERENCES

• 1. Button G, Wolinsky P, Hak D. Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma, 2004;18:565-570.
• 2. Davison BL. Varus collapse of comminuted distal femur fractures after open reduction and internal fixation with a lateral condylar buttress plate. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2003;32:27-30.
• 3. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Abane L, Arlettaz Y, Bonnomet F. Minimally-invasive internal fixation of extra-articular distal femur fractures using a locking plate: tricks of the trade. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2011;97:201-205.
• 4. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Arlettaz Y, et al. Minimally-invasive fixation of distal extra-articular femur fractures with locking plates: limitations and failures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2011;97:668-674.Article
• 5. Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R, Frenk A, Gilbert S, Schavan R. The development of the distal femur Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). Injury, 2001;32:Suppl 3. SC24-SC31.Article
• 6. Giles JB, DeLee JC, Heckman JD, Keever JE. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982;64:864-870.Article
• 7. Han SB, Choi IC, Lee SH, Suh DH, Cho HJ. Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal femoral fracture. J Korean Fract Soc, 2006;19:11-16.
• 8. Janzing HM, Stockman B, Van Damme G, Rommens P, Broos PL. The retrograde intramedullary nail: prospective experience in patients older than sixty-five years. J Orthop Trauma, 1998;12:330-333.Article
• 9. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2004;18:509-520.
• 10. Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Alonso J. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury, 2001;32:Suppl 3. SC32-SC47.Article
• 11. Krettek C, Müller M, Miclau T. Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury, 2001;32:Suppl 3. SC14-SC23.
• 12. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Bertram R, Holmes W, Tscherne H. Transarticular joint reconstruction and indirect plate osteosynthesis for complex distal supracondylar femoral fractures. Injury, 1997;28:Suppl 1. A31-A41.Article
• 13. Mize RD. Surgical management of complex fractures of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989;(240):77-86.Article
• 14. Park KC, Chung KS, Moon JK. Treatment of distal femur fracture with minimally invasive locking compression plate osteosynthesis. J Korean Fract Soc, 2012;25:13-19.Article
• 15. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002;84:1093-1110.
• 16. Schatzker J. Fractures of the distal femur revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998;(347):43-56.
• 17. Schatzker J, Home G, Waddell J. The Toronto experience with the supracondylar fracture of the femur, 1966-72. Injury, 1974;6:113-128.
• 18. Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C, et al. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury, 2001;32:Suppl 3. SC48-SC54.
• 19. Siliski JM, Mahring M, Hofer HP. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur. Treatment by internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989;71:95-104.
• 20. Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury, 2003;34:Suppl 2. B31-B42.
• 21. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005). J Orthop Trauma, 2006;20:366-371.

Fig. 1

Indirect reduction and temporary plate fixation with reduction forceps and K-wires.

Fig. 2

(A, B) The initial radiograph of 68-year-old female shows comminuted metaphyseal fracture of distal femur (AO/OTA classification A3).

(C, D) Radiographs show a postoperative state.

(E, F) At postoperative 20 weeks, radiograph shows maintenance of reduction and bony union.

(G, H) At postoperative 20 weeks, range of motion of knee is good.

Fig. 3

(A, B) The initial radiograph of 69-year-old female shows simple spiral metaphyseal fracture of distal femur (AO/OTA classification A1).

(C, D) Post operative radiographs shows 7° valgus alignment: the epiphyseal screws are not parallel to the joint line.

(E, F) At postoperative 24 weeks, radiograph shows maintenance of reduction and bony union.

Table 1

Patient Demographics, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

KSS: Knee society score, ROM: Range of motion, AP: Anteriorposterior, Lat: Lateral, F: Female, M: Male, TA: Traffic accident, Supf.: Superficial.

Table 2

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

KSS: Knee society score, ROM: Range of motion.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Surgical Treatment of AO/OTA 33-C Intra-Articular Distal Femoral Fractures through Parapatellar Approach
  Suk Kyu Choo, Sung Tan Cho, Hyoung Keun Oh
  Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2022; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
• Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis
  Byung-Ho Yoon, In Keun Park, Youngwoo Kim, Hyoung-Keun Oh, Suk Kyu Choo, Yerl-Bo Sung
  Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2021; 141(2): 225.     CrossRef