REFERENCES

• 1. Allen MJ, Park CK, Yuan PS. Barrier techniques for preventing PMMA induced thermal injury of the spinal cord, In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; Chicago, Rider Dickerson; 1998. p. 240.
• 2. Bohner M, Baroud G. Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes. Biomaterials, 2005;26:1553-1563.Article
• 3. Brown WB, Chow LC. A new calcium phosphate, watersetting cement. Cements Research Progress. 1986. p. 351-379.
• 4. Chow LC. Development of self-setting calcium phosphate cements. The Centennial Memorial Issue of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 1991;99:954-964.Article
• 5. Chow LC, Takagi S, Constantino PD, Friedman CD. Selfsetting calcium phosphate cements. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1991;179:3-24.
• 6. Dahners LE, Jacobs RR. Long bone defects treated with demineralized bone. South Med J, 1985;78:933-934.
• 7. Freitag TA, Cannon SL. Fracture characteristics of acrylic bone cements. II. Fatigue. J Biomed Mater Res, 1977;11:609-624.
• 8. Gbureck U, Barralet JE, Spatz K, Grover LM, Thull R. Ionic modification of calcium phosphate cement viscosity. Part I: hypodermic injection and strength improvement of apatite cement. Biomaterials, 2004;25:2187-2195.
• 9. Gepstein R, Weiss RE, Hallel T. Bridging large defects in bone by demineralized bone matrix in the form of a powder. A radiographic, histological, and radioisotope - uptake study in rats. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1987;69:984-992.
• 10. Handal JA, Wallace J, Dossett AB. Autograft vs composite autograft/demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion. North Am Spine Soc, 1997;12:333-334.
• 11. Hwang J, Kim JH, Kim JH. Vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fracture more than 1 year follow up. J Korean Fract Soc, 2004;17:368-373.
• 12. Johnson JA, Provan JW, Krygier JJ, Chan KH, Miller J. Fatigue of acrylic bone cement - effect of frequency and environment. J Biomed Mater Res, 1989;23:819-831.
• 13. Khairoun I, Boltong MG, Driessens FC, Planell JA. Some factors controlling the injectability of calcium phosphate bone cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 1998;9:425-428.
• 14. Kim YW, Chang HG, Lee KB, Ji YN, Lee YB, Ku JM. Vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. J Korean Fract Soc, 2004;17:49-54.
• 15. Konno S, Olmarker K, Byröd G, Nordborg C, Strömgvist B, Rydevik B. The European Spine Society AcroMed Prize 1994. Acute thermal nerve root injury. Eur Spine J, 1994;3:299-302.
• 16. Lapras C, Mottolese C, Deruty R, Lapras C Jr, Remond J, Duguesnel J. Percutaneous injection of methyl-metacrylate in osteoporosis and severe vertebral osteolysis (Galibert's technic). Ann Chir, 1989;43:371-376.
• 17. Lowery GL, Maxwell KM, Karasick D. Comparison of autograft and composite grafts of demineralized bone matrix and autologous bone in posterolateral fusions: an interim report. Innov Tech Biol Med, 1995;16:18.
• 18. Martin G, Boden SD, Morone MA. New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Spine, 1999;24:637-645.
• 19. Mirtchi AA, Lemaitre J, Terao N. Calcium phosphate cements: study of the beta-tricalcium phosphate - monocalcium phosphate system. Biomaterials, 1989;10:475-480.
• 20. Morone MA, Boden SD. Experimental posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with a demineralized bone matrix gel. Spine, 1998;23:159-167.
• 21. Ohura K, Bohner M, Hardouin P, Lemaître J, Pasquier G, Flautre B. Resorption of, and bone formation from, new beta-tricalcium phosphate-monocalcium phosphate cements: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res, 1996;30:193-200.
• 22. Peters KR, Guiot BH, Martin PA, Fessler RG. Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: current practice and evolving techniques. Neurosurgery, 2002;51:S96-S103.
• 23. Sassard WR, Eidman DK, Gray PM, et al. Augmenting local bone with Grafton demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: avoiding second site autologous bone harvest. Orthopedics, 2000;23:1059-1064.
• 24. Slew S, Chow LC, O'Young A, Tssao NK, Brown W. Evaluation of the biocompatilibity of a new calcium phosphate setting cement. J Dent Res, 1986;65:195.
• 25. Sugawara A, Chow LC, Takagi S, Chohayeb H. In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of a calcium phosphate cement when used as a root canal sealer-filler. J Endod, 1990;16:162-165.
• 26. Tuli SM, Singh AD. The osteoinductive property of decalcified bone matrix. An experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1978;60:116-123.
• 27. Wang JS, Franzen H, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lidgren L. Does vacuum mixing of bone cement affect heat generation? Analysis of four cement brands. J Appl Biomater, 1995;6:105-108.
• 28. Wu SS, Lachmann E, Nagler W. Current medical, rehabilitation, and surgical management of vertebral compression fractures. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2003;12:17-26.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the injectability test (A) and acryl mold for the rheological test (B).

Fig. 2

Injectability (I) of the DBM-CP composites.

Fig. 3

Rheological behavior of the DBM-CP composites injected into acryl mold.

(A) Plain CPC.

(B) 20 volume % of DBM.

(C) 30 volume % of DBM.

(D) 40 volume % of DBM.

(E) 50 volume % of DBM.

Fig. 4

Setting time of the DBM-CP composites.

Fig. 5

Tmperature rise of the DBM-CP composites.

Fig. 6

Optical microscopic findings of DBM (A) and DBMCP composites (B). After selfsetting procedure of 50 volume percent DBM-CP composites, the mixture showed even distribution of DBM.

Table 1

Ohura's recipe of self-setting CPC and the amount of aqueous media

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by