Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > > Volume 11(2); 1998 > Article
Original Article
The Treatment of the Proximal Tibia Fracture -Comparison of the Variable Method of Fixation-
Dong Heon Kim, Kyu cheol Shin, Kyeong Soon Kim, Byeong Chun Chang, Dae Sul Kang
Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures 1998;11(2):442-448.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1998.11.2.442
Published online: June 23, 2016

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kon Kuk University, Choong Ju, Korea.

Copyright © The Korean Fracture Society

  • 50 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • The treatment of proximal tibial fracture is an area of great controversy. Because open and comminuted fractures are common, selection of fixation method of the proximal tibial fracture is more difficult than any other fractures. Many authors reported high rate of malunion and loss of reduction. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of the proximal tibial fractures depending on the fixation method. We evaluated the records of 35 patients (36 fractures) who had been treated with intramedullary nailing, plate and screws and external fixation from January 1989 to January 1996. The mean period of follow-up was 12months. Of the 36 fractures, 8 fractures were with intramedullary nailing, 12 fractures with plate and screws, 16 fractures with external fixator. In intramedullary nailing groupp, the average time of bony union was nineteen weeks (16-27), in plate and screws fixation group twenty three weeks (18-31) and in external fixation group 22 weeks (19-29). The complications of intramedullary nailing group were 3 nonunions, 1 delayed union, 1 varus deformity, 2 anterior angulations and 2 cases of deep wound infection. The complications of plate and screws group were 1 nonunion, 3 delayed union, 1 deep wound infection, 2 superficial infections and in most fractures partial stiffiness of knee joint. The complications of external fixator group were 1 nonunion, 1 delayed union, 1 deep wound infection, 6 pin tract infections and 3 cases of knee joint stiffness. In our cases, if there is open wound higher than Gustilo grade III-B and severe comminuted fracture initially, the external fixation is more preferred for wound management and also more advantageous method for the patients who got a multiple trauma in abdomen, chest and head injuries. In closed fractures and Gustilo grade I, II open fractures, intramedullary nailing is considered to be more preferable method. But the anatomy of proximal tibia made nailing these fractures technically difficult. In conclusion, we consider each method of fixation is useful fixation method of the proximal tibial fractures, but each method should be selected advertently depending on the severity of soft tissue injury and the degree of comminution of the fractures.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        The Treatment of the Proximal Tibia Fracture -Comparison of the Variable Method of Fixation-
        J Korean Soc Fract. 1998;11(2):442-448.   Published online April 30, 1998
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      We recommend
      Related articles
      The Treatment of the Proximal Tibia Fracture -Comparison of the Variable Method of Fixation-
      The Treatment of the Proximal Tibia Fracture -Comparison of the Variable Method of Fixation-

      J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures
      Close layer
      TOP