Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 34(2); 2021 > Article
Review Article Ankle Fractures in Children: Classification and Treatment
Ha-Yong Kim, Yong-Han Cha, Woo-Suk Kim, Won-Sik Choy
Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma 2021;34(2):87-95.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2021.34.2.87
Published online: April 30, 2021
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea

prev
  • 34 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev

Pediatric ankle fractures are defined as damage to the metaphysis, epiphyseal plate, and epiphysis of the distal tibia and fibula. Although the injury mechanism could be similar, the fracture patterns and treatment of pediatric ankle fractures are different from those of adults. In children, growth plate injuries are more common with a force that would cause sprains in adults because the ligaments are stronger than the growth plate cartilage in children. In the adolescent period, unique fractures, called “transitional fractures”, occur while the physis is closed. For a diagnosis, plain images of the anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views are essential. Stress radiographs, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging can be used for suspected ligament injuries. The treatment goal is to restore the articular congruity, normal bony alignment, and preserve the epiphyseal plate to ensure normal growth. Pediatric ankle fractures frequently lead to premature physeal arrest, angular deformities, malunion, and posttraumatic arthritis even after anatomic reduction. Treating surgeons should follow-up children for a sufficient time and explain to the caregiver the possible complications before treatment.


J Korean Fract Soc. 2021 Apr;34(2):87-95. Korean.
Published online Apr 23, 2021.
Copyright © 2021 The Korean Fracture Society. All rights reserved.
Review

Ankle Fractures in Children: Classification and Treatment

Ha-Yong Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Yong-Han Cha, M.D., Ph.D., Woo-Suk Kim, M.D. and Won-Sik Choy, M.D., Ph.D.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea.
Received March 17, 2021; Revised March 30, 2021; Accepted March 30, 2021.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Pediatric ankle fractures are defined as damage to the metaphysis, epiphyseal plate, and epiphysis of the distal tibia and fibula. Although the injury mechanism could be similar, the fracture patterns and treatment of pediatric ankle fractures are different from those of adults. In children, growth plate injuries are more common with a force that would cause sprains in adults because the ligaments are stronger than the growth plate cartilage in children. In the adolescent period, unique fractures, called “transitional fractures”, occur while the physis is closed. For a diagnosis, plain images of the anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views are essential. Stress radiographs, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging can be used for suspected ligament injuries. The treatment goal is to restore the articular congruity, normal bony alignment, and preserve the epiphyseal plate to ensure normal growth. Pediatric ankle fractures frequently lead to premature physeal arrest, angular deformities, malunion, and posttraumatic arthritis even after anatomic reduction. Treating surgeons should follow-up children for a sufficient time and explain to the caregiver the possible complications before treatment.

Keywords
Ankle, Pediatric fracture, Classification, Treatment, Complication

Figures

Fig. 1
Ossification centers around the ankle joint in children. Revised from the article of Peterson and Peterson (J Trauma, 12: 275–281, 1972).8)

Fig. 2
Order of physeal closure in the distal tibia. Revised from the article of Mac Nealy et al. (AJR Am J Roentgenol, 138: 683-689, 1982).10)

Fig. 3
A 9-year-old male child suffered a left ankle injury. The patient had minimal swelling on the left ankle. (A) Initial anteroposterior radiography of both ankles showed that the physis of the left side was wider than the right side. (B) On the oblique image, the Thurston Holland sign was positive (+).

Fig. 4
A 6-year-old girl suffered a medial malleolus fracture on her right ankle. (A) Initial C-arm image of right ankle taken intraoperatively. (B) Stress C-arm image showed varus instability, meaning ligamentous injury in supination-inversion type of Dias–Tachdjian classification.

Fig. 5
(A) Salter–Harris physeal injury classification. (B) Type VI physeal missing injury. Revised from the article of Salter and Harris (J Bone Joint Surg Am, 45: 587-622, 1963).18)

Fig. 6
A 6-year-old male child was hit by a truck and suffered an open crushing injury of the right foot and ankle. (A) In the initial images, some bone defects of the distal tibia were observed (Peterson type VI physeal injury). (B, C) Emergent Ilizarov fixation, open reduction and internal fixation with plate and K-wires, and wound repair were performed. (D) On the 6-year follow-up, the patient had a 2 cm leg length discrepancy, and epiphysiodesis on the left proximal tibia was performed. (E) On the 9-year follow-up, leg length discrepancy was reduced to less than 1 cm. The fracture healed without complication at the 9-year follow-up.

Fig. 7
Dias–Tachdjian classification of ankle fractures in children. (a, b) Supination-inversion pattern includes Salter–Harris (SH) type I distal fibular fracture in Stage 1 injury with the addition of medial distal tibial fracture (SH type IIV) in Stage 2 injury. (c) Pronation-eversion external rotation injury demonstrates SH type II fracture of the lateral distal tibia with distal fibular diaphyseal fracture. (d) Supination-plantar flexion injury reveals SH type II fracture of the posterior distal tibia. (e, f) Supination-external rotation injury includes spiral SH type II fracture of the distal tibia in Stage 1 with the addition of spiral fracture of the distal fibular metadiaphysis in Stage 2. Revised from the article of Dias and Tachdjian (Clin Orthop Relat Res, (136): 230-233, 1978).20)

Fig. 8
An 11-year-old male child suffered distal tibia and lateral malleolus fractures. (A) Thick periosteal flap was interposed in the fracture gap. The white arrow refers to the periosteum detached from distal metaphysis, and the black arrow refers to the periosteum pulled out from the gap. (B) Salter–Harris type II epiphyseal injury was observed initially in the distal tibia. (C) Periosteal repair and open reduction and internal fixation with tension band wiring were done. (D) The fracture healed without complications at the 6-year follow-up.

Fig. 9
A 10-year-old female child suffered a left ankle fracture. (A) The initial anteroposterior image showed Salter–Harris type III physeal injury. (B) The initial computed tomography image showed “Tillaux fracture” caused by an avulsion of the anterior tibiofibular ligament. (C) The fragment was fixed with a cannulated screw placed in the epiphysis. (D) The fracture healed without complications at the 1-year follow-up.

Fig. 10
A 15-year-old male child suffered a left ankle fracture. (A) The initial anteroposterior and lateral images of the distal tibia showed a complex fracture line, extending from metaphysis to the epiphysis (Salter–Harris type IV). (B) Computed tomography showed Salter–Harris type III injury on the coronal image and Salter–Harris type II on the sagittal image (triplane fracture). (C) The fragments were fixed with an epiphyseal cannulated screw and a metaphyseal cannulated screw (4.0 mm). (D) The fracture healed without complication at the 1-year follow-up.

Fig. 11
A 9-year-old male child suffered a medial malleolus fracture. (A) The initial anteroposterior (AP) image showed Salter–Harris type III physeal injury. (B) Tension band wiring was done. (C) The 1-year follow-up AP image showed premature physeal arrest (peripheral type, white arrow) and 15° of ankle varus deformity. (D) Computed tomography (CT) images. (E, F) Physeal bar was resected using intra-operative CT. (G) One year after the Langenskiold procedure, normal growth was restored, and the ankle varus was corrected spontaneously.

Notes

Financial support:None.

Conflict of interests:None.

References

    1. Landin LA, Danielsson LG. Children's ankle fractures. Classification and epidemiology. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:634–640.
    1. Denning JR. Complications of pediatric foot and ankle fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2017;48:59–70.
    1. Lyons RA, Delahunty AM, Kraus D, et al. Children's fractures: a population based study. Inj Prev 1999;5:129–132.
    1. Rohmiller MT, Gaynor TP, Pawelek J, Mubarak SJ. Salter-Harris I and II fractures of the distal tibia: does mechanism of injury relate to premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop 2006;26:322–328.
    1. Olgun ZD, Maestre S. Management of pediatric ankle fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2018;11:475–484.
    1. von Laer L. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of transitional fractures of the distal part of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:687–698.
    1. Spiegel PG, Cooperman DR, Laros GS. Epiphyseal fractures of the distal ends of the tibia and fibula. A retrospective study of two hundred and thirty-seven cases in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:1046–1050.
    1. Peterson CA, Peterson HA. Analysis of the incidence of injuries to the epiphyseal growth plate. J Trauma 1972;12:275–281.
    1. Su AW, Larson AN. Pediatric ankle fractures: concepts and treatment principles. Foot Ankle Clin 2015;20:705–719.
    1. Mac Nealy GA, Rogers LF, Hernandez R, Poznanski AK. Injuries of the distal tibial epiphysis: systematic radiographic evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;138:683–689.
    1. Gill JB, Risko T, Raducan V, Grimes JS, Schutt RC Jr. Comparison of manual and gravity stress radiographs for the evaluation of supination-external rotation fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:994–999.
    1. Rapariz JM, Ocete G, González-Herranz P, et al. Distal tibial triplane fractures: long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:113–118.
    1. Healy WA 3rd, Starkweather KD, Meyer J, Teplitz GA. Triplane fracture associated with a proximal third fibula fracture. Am J Orthop. Belle Mead NJ 1996;25:449–451.
    1. Jones S, Colaco K, Fischer J, Stimec J, Kwan C, Boutis K. Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for pediatric ankle sprain injuries. Pediatr Emerg Care 2018;34:842–847.
    1. Eismann EA, Stephan ZA, Mehlman CT, et al. Pediatric triplane ankle fractures: impact of radiographs and computed tomography on fracture classification and treatment planning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:995–1002.
    1. Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, Simpson AK, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1882–1889.
    1. Boutis K, Plint A, Stimec J, et al. Radiograph-negative lateral ankle injuries in children: occult growth plate fracture or sprain? JAMA Pediatr 2016;170:e154114
    1. Salter RB, Harris WR. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963;45:587–622.
    1. Chadwick CJ, Bentley G. The classification and prognosis of epiphyseal injuries. Injury 1987;18:157–168.
    1. Dias LS, Tachdjian MO. Physeal injuries of the ankle in children: classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;(136):230–233.
    1. Vahvanen V, Aalto K. Classification of ankle fractures in children. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1980;97:1–5.
    1. Cooperman DR, Spiegel PG, Laros GS. Tibial fractures involving the ankle in children. The so-called triplane epiphyseal fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:1040–1046.
    1. Barmada A, Gaynor T, Mubarak SJ. Premature physeal closure following distal tibia physeal fractures: a new radiographic predictor. J Pediatr Orthop 2003;23:733–739.
    1. Leary JT, Handling M, Talerico M, Yong L, Bowe JA. Physeal fractures of the distal tibia: predictive factors of premature physeal closure and growth arrest. J Pediatr Orthop 2009;29:356–361.
    1. Aitken AP. Fractures of the epiphyses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1965;41:19–23.
    1. Russo F, Moor MA, Mubarak SJ, Pennock AT. Salter-Harris II fractures of the distal tibia: does surgical management reduce the risk of premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop 2013;33:524–529.
    1. Kärrholm J. The triplane fracture: four years of follow-up of 21 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop B 1997;6:91–102.
    1. Blackburn EW, Aronsson DD, Rubright JH, Lisle JW. Ankle fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1234–1244.
    1. de Sanctis N, Della Corte S, Pempinello C. Distal tibial and fibular epiphyseal fractures in children: prognostic criteria and long-term results in 158 patients. J Pediatr Orthop B 2000;9:40–44.
    1. Kling TF Jr, Bright RW, Hensinger RN. Distal tibial physeal fractures in children that may require open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:647–657.
    1. Hasler CC, Foster BK. Secondary tethers after physeal bar resection: a common source of failure? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(405):242–249.
    1. Cass JR, Peterson HA. Salter-Harris Type-IV injuries of the distal tibial epiphyseal growth plate, with emphasis on those involving the medial malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1059–1070.
    1. Ogden JA. Injury to the growth mechanisms of the immature skeleton. Skeletal Radiol 1981;6:237–253.
    1. Tarr RR, Resnick CT, Wagner KS, Sarmiento A. Changes in tibiotalar joint contact areas following experimentally induced tibial angular deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;(199):72–80.
    1. Langenskiöld A. Traumatic premature closure of the distal tibial epiphyseal plate. Acta Orthop Scand 1967;38:520–531.
    1. Caterini R, Farsetti P, Ippolito E. Long-term followup of physeal injury to the ankle. Foot Ankle 1991;11:372–383.
  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Ankle Fractures in Children: Classification and Treatment
    J Korean Fract Soc. 2021;34(2):87-95.   Published online April 30, 2021
    Close
Related articles

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
Close layer
TOP