Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 33(3); 2020 > Article
Original Article Clinical Outcome after Treatment of Tibia Segmental Fracture with Intramedullary Nailing and Minimal Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
Jun Young Lee, Hyung Seok Park, Dong Hyuk Cha
Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma 2020;33(3):142-147.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.3.142
Published online: July 31, 2020
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chosun University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea

prev next
  • 28 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Purpose
This study examined the clinical outcomes after the treatment of a tibia segmental fracture with intramedullary nailing (IM nailing) and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).
Materials and Methods
From July 2012 to December 2017, 14 out of 17 cases from a treatment cohort of 32 cases of AO type 42 C2 tibia segmental fractures with IM nailing and MIPO were studied retrospectively. Periodic radiographs were used to evaluate the presence of union, union time, and radiographic evaluation of bony union (varus-valgus deformity, anteroposterior angular deformity, shortening). To evaluate the postoperative clinical function, modified Rasmussen’s system was used for proximal fractures, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society functional score was used for distal fractures.
Results
Bony union was achieved in all 14 cases, and the average union time was 26 weeks. In one case of soil contamination, there were no other complications other than simple debridement after a soft tissue infection. The mean varus was two degrees; the mean anteroposterior angular deformity was three degrees of anterior oblique; the mean length shortening was 5 mm (2-9 mm). The mean functional score of the knee joint with the Modified Rasmussen’s system measured for the postoperative clinical function was relatively good (excellent 9, good 4, fair 1, and poor 0). The results of the Molander and Olerud Functional scores of the ankle joints were also good (excellent 8, good 3, fair 2, poor 0).
Conclusion
The treatment of tibia segmental fractures with IM nailing and MIPO can effectively reduce the gap of fracture sites. Hence, it is possible to increase the bony union probability and obtain relatively satisfactory alignment. Overall, the treatment of tibia segmental fractures with IM nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis appears to be a useful treatment, considering the preservation of the soft tissue and the alignment of the tibia.


J Korean Fract Soc. 2020 Jul;33(3):142-147. Korean.
Published online Jul 24, 2020.
Copyright © 2020 The Korean Fracture Society. All rights reserved.
Original Article

Clinical Outcome after Treatment of Tibia Segmental Fracture with Intramedullary Nailing and Minimal Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis

Jun Young Lee, M.D., Hyung Seok Park, M.D. and Dong Hyuk Cha, M.D.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chosun University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
Received February 23, 2020; Revised March 05, 2020; Accepted May 08, 2020.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the clinical outcomes after the treatment of a tibia segmental fracture with intramedullary nailing (IM nailing) and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).

Materials and Methods

From July 2012 to December 2017, 14 out of 17 cases from a treatment cohort of 32 cases of AO type 42 C2 tibia segmental fractures with IM nailing and MIPO were studied retrospectively. Periodic radiographs were used to evaluate the presence of union, union time, and radiographic evaluation of bony union (varus-valgus deformity, anteroposterior angular deformity, shortening). To evaluate the postoperative clinical function, modified Rasmussen's system was used for proximal fractures, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society functional score was used for distal fractures.

Results

Bony union was achieved in all 14 cases, and the average union time was 26 weeks. In one case of soil contamination, there were no other complications other than simple debridement after a soft tissue infection. The mean varus was two degrees; the mean anteroposterior angular deformity was three degrees of anterior oblique; the mean length shortening was 5 mm (2–9 mm). The mean functional score of the knee joint with the Modified Rasmussen's system measured for the postoperative clinical function was relatively good (excellent 9, good 4, fair 1, and poor 0). The results of the Molander and Olerud Functional scores of the ankle joints were also good (excellent 8, good 3, fair 2, poor 0).

Conclusion

The treatment of tibia segmental fractures with IM nailing and MIPO can effectively reduce the gap of fracture sites. Hence, it is possible to increase the bony union probability and obtain relatively satisfactory alignment. Overall, the treatment of tibia segmental fractures with IM nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis appears to be a useful treatment, considering the preservation of the soft tissue and the alignment of the tibia.

Keywords
Tibia segmental fracture, Intramedullary nailing, Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis

Figures

Fig. 1
Clinical photograph and fluoroscopic X-rays show the use of a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for provisional fixation (A), anteroposterior (B), and lateral (C). Postoperative X-rays shows anteroposterior (D) and lateral (E) views.

Fig. 2
Clinical photographs and X-rays show the use of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal tibia segmental fracture. (A) Preoperative X-ray. (B) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. (C) Postoperative X-ray.

Fig. 3
A 57-year-old male patient had a tibia segmental fracture in AO classification 42-C2 after direct stroke and crushing. Intramedullary nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis were performed. A postoperative 17-month radiograph showed the healed tibia fracture, and the implant was removed. (A) Preoperative X-ray. (B) Postoperative X-ray. (C) Postoperative day 17 month; implant removal.

Tables

Table 1
Functional and Radiological Results

Notes

Financial support:None.

Conflict of interests:None.

References

    1. Dunbar RP, Nork SE, Barei DP, Mills WJ. Provisional plating of Type III open tibia fractures prior to intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:412–414.
    1. Rommens PM, Coosemans W, Broos PL. The difficult healing of segmental fractures of the tibial shaft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989;108:238–242.
    1. Park SS, Lee JY, Ha SH, Park SH. Outcomes and analysis of factors affecting bone union after interlocking intramedullary nailing in segmental tibia fractures. J Korean Fract Soc 2013;26:275–283.
    1. Giotakis N, Panchani SK, Narayan B, Larkin JJ, Al Maskari S, Nayagam S. Segmental fractures of the tibia treated by circular external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:687–692.
    1. Sohn OJ, Park CH, Bae SK. Ipsilateral femoral segmental and tibial fractures: a case report. J Korean Fract Soc 2009;22:193–196.
    1. Corey RM, Park NK, Cannada LK. Segmental tibia fractures: an analysis of complication and healing rates. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:296–300.
    1. Bali K, Kumar V, Patel S, Aggarwal S. Double segmental tibial fractures: an unusual fracture pattern. Chin J Traumatol 2011;14:247–249.
    1. Ma CH, Tu YK, Yeh JH, Yang SC, Wu CH. Using external and internal locking plates in a two-stage protocol for treatment of segmental tibial fractures. J Trauma 2011;71:614–619.
    1. Zhu DC, Liu L, Gao F, Li Q, Zhang B. Comparison of closed reduction and expert tibial nailing with open reduction and plate and screw fixation in the treatment of two segmental tibial fractures. Chin J Traumatol 2015;18:219–222.
    1. Yang KH. Distal tibial nailing. J Korean Fract Soc 2009;22:300–305.
    1. Yoon RS, Gage MJ, Donegan DJ, Liporace FA. Intramedullary nailing and adjunct permanent plate fixation in complex tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:e277–e279.
    1. Laflamme GY, Heimlich D, Stephen D, Kreder HJ, Whyne CM. Proximal tibial fracture stability with intramedullary nail fixation using oblique interlocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17:496–502.
    1. Yoon RS, Liporace FA. Intramedullary nail and plate combination fixation for complex distal tibia fractures: when and how? J Orthop Trauma 2016;30 Suppl 4:S17–S21.
    1. Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Stephan C, Möhlmann U, Tscherne H. The mechanical effect of blocking screws (“Poller screws”) in stabilizing tibia fractures with short proximal or distal fragments after insertion of small-diameter intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 1999;13:550–553.
    1. Nork SE, Barei DP, Schildhauer TA, et al. Intramedullary nailing of proximal quarter tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:523–528.
    1. Byun YS, Shin DJ. Intramedullary nailing of proximal tibial fractures. J Korean Fract Soc 2009;22:197–205.
    1. Attinger CE, Evans KK, Bulan E, Blume P, Cooper P. Angiosomes of the foot and ankle and clinical implications for limb salvage: reconstruction, incisions, and revascularization. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117 7 Suppl:261S–293S.
  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Clinical Outcome after Treatment of Tibia Segmental Fracture with Intramedullary Nailing and Minimal Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
    J Korean Fract Soc. 2020;33(3):142-147.   Published online July 31, 2020
    Close

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
Close layer
TOP