Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > > Volume 10(1); 1997 > Article
Original Article
Operative Treatment of Forearm Fractures in Children
Nam Gee Lee, Seung Ki Kim, Won Jong Bahk, Hyun Joon Song, Ban Chang
Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures 1997;10(1):195-202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1997.10.1.195
Published online: June 24, 2016

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UiJongBu St. Marys Hospital Catholic University Medical College, Korea.

Copyright © The Korean Fracture Society

  • 76 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • Management of severe diaphyseal fracture of radius and ulna in children can be a challenging problem. Reduction and maintenance of the position of two mobile parallel bones is difficult because pronating and supinating muscles produce angulatory as well as rotational forces. Open reduction and internal fixation are generally accepted for adult forearm fractures, but controversy surrounds open reduction for children. What should be done for the irreducible fracture that will result in a malunion? Several authors advocate open reduction in children over 10 years of age rather than accept poor position. And others advocate open reduction regardless of age if closed reduction is unsatisfactory. We reviewed thirteen children between 6-14 years of age, who had irreducible fractures of diaphysis of forearm both bone, and who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with plate for mid 1/3 fractures(4 cases) and open reduction and internal fixation with K-wires for distal 1/3 fractures(9 cases). The results were as follows; 1. 2 cases(15%) had limitation of pronation within 10 comparing with uninjured side. But 11 cases(85%) had equal movements on both sides. And the range of motions of the elbow and wrist are within normal limit. 2. More than 20 angulation for mid 1/3 fracture over 10 years of age, and more than 20 angulation or 20% displacement for distal 1/3 fracture over 6 years of age, it would be better to perform a surgical treatment if nonsurgical treatment was failed. 3. Immobilization periods were 5 weeks for plate fixation group and 6.9 weeks for K-wire fixatioin group. Bone union was occurred in all cases, at 9 weeks in plate fixation group and 8 weeks in K-wire fixation group. 4. Its better to fix with plate ofr promimal 2/3 fracture and K-wire for distal 1/3 fracture in case of operation. In conclusion, our results of open reduction and internal fixation were satisfactory if adequate alignment of fractures had not been achieved or maintained.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Operative Treatment of Forearm Fractures in Children
        J Korean Soc Fract. 1997;10(1):195-202.   Published online January 31, 1997
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      We recommend
      Related articles
      Operative Treatment of Forearm Fractures in Children
      Operative Treatment of Forearm Fractures in Children

      J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures
      Close layer
      TOP