PURPOSE To evaluate the relationship between the length changes of both forearm bones and function of wrist. To know permitted length discrepancy for good wrist function after operation in fracture of both bones of forearm MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Jan. 1995 to Dec. 2000, 21 cases were followed over 1 year, were treated with compression plate and screws due to fracture of both bones of forearm in our hospital. Mean duration of follow-up was 3 years 6 months. The postoperative length difference was compared to preoperative or unaffected side in roentgenography. Four groups were defined to A, B, C and D by postoperative length difference ; < or =1mm, 1 2mm, 2 3mm, and >3mm for comparison. The function of wrist joint was evaluated with the Anderson 's classification and Mayo modified wrist score. RESULT Group A were 11 cases(52.3%), B 5 cases(23.8%), C 4 cases(19.0%) and D 1 case(4.8%). By the Anderson 's classification, the number of Excellent were 11 cases(52.3%), Good 7(33.3%), Fair 3(14.3%). In the group of the length difference lesser than 2mm, the number of Excellent were 11, and Good 5. The Mayo modified wrist score was 75.15 in the group of the length difference lesser than 2mm, that was higher than 61.15 in the group of more than 2mm. CONCLUSION To obtain a good wrist function after operative treatment of fracture of both bones of forearm the length discrepancy of both bones should be lesser than 2mm.
PURPOSE To analyze the clinical and radiological result of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm both bones treated by plate fixation and plate fixation with intramedullary nailing. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed 52 cases of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm both bones in adults that were treated and the follow-up period was 1 year above. The first group(I), 25 cases(48.1%) were treated with plate fixation in radius and ulna, the second group(II), 27 cases(51.9%) were treated with plate fixation in radius and threaded Steinman pin fixation in ulna. we analyzed the results by average union time and functional result according to Anderson's criteria. RESULTS The mean duration of union was in the first group, 12.3 weeks in the second group, 13.2 weeks. By Anderson's criteria, in the first group, 21 cases(84%) and in the second group, 22 cases(81.5%) had a good result. As complications in the first group, non-union 2 case, angulation deformity 1 case, rotational deformity 1 case and in the second group, non-union 4 cases, angulation deformity 2 cases. CONCLUSION We considered that satisfactory results can be obtained by rigid internal fixation with plates in radius & ulna and early mobilization in fractures of forearm both bones in adults and according to the type of fracture, Fixation with plate in radius and threaded Steinman pin in ulna was one of the proper methods.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Treatment of a Segmental Ulnar Shaft Fracture and an Olecranon Fracture Myoung Soo Kim, Kyu Pill Moon, Hyung Joon Cho, Jung Yun Bae, Kuen Tak Suh Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2010; 45(6): 496. CrossRef
Treatment of Forearm Shaft Fracture with Modified Interlocking Intramedullary Nail Kwang-Yul Kim, Moon-Sup Lim, Shin-Kwon Choi, Hyeong-Jo Yoon Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2008; 21(2): 157. CrossRef
Diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna present high incidence of malunion and nonunion because of difficulty in reduction and maintenence of two mobile, parallel ones in the presence of the pronating and supinating muscles which exert angulatory as well as well as rotational forces. The author divided the traceable patients into two groups, the one was the group treated with AO compression plates and the other one was the roup treated with Rush pin in radius and AO compression plate in ulna, and compared the results in the aspect of healing time and functional results. The results were as follows; 1.Those two groups were demographically similar.
2.The immobilization period and the radiologic bone union time did not differentiate two groups significantly.
3.In plate group, one nonunion, one nerve injury and two superficial wound infection were occurred.
4.Between the two operative methods selected alternatively, immobilization period, radiologic bone union and fuctional results were not different significantly, but the Rush pinning method was preferred due to simple operation technique, small operation scar, short operation time, a little blood loss, a few complication.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Shaft Fractures of Both Forearm Bones: The Outcomes of Surgical Treatment with Plating Only and Combined Plating and Intramedullary Nailing Sang Bum Kim, Youn Moo Heo, Jin Woong Yi, Jung Bum Lee, Byoung Gu Lim Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2015; 7(3): 282. CrossRef
Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing of Forearm Shaft Fractures in Adults Sanglim Lee, Hee-Sung Lee, Yerl-Bo Sung, Jae-Kwang Yum Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2009; 22(1): 30. CrossRef
The diaphyseal fractures of radius and ulnar have many problems like nonunion, malunion and functional disturbance with conservative treatment. Therefore, open anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation have been widely used. The plate fixation has been employed in most both forearm bone fractures and the intramedullary pinning usually used in cases of the open fractures, comminuted types, multiple fractures or poor general conditions. Seventeen patients were treated with semitubular plate and eighteen cases by the closed or open reduction and intramedullary fixation with Rush pin(the operation methods were decised alternatively) were followed up more than one year at Soonchunhyang Gumi Hospital from June 1988 to Nov. 1992 and the results were compared and analyzed clinically.
1. Those two groups were demographically similar.
2. The operation time was 65 minites in Rush pin group, 85.6 minutes in plate group and the blood loss was 37.1cc in Rush pin group,85.3cc in plate group.
3. The immobilization period and the radiologic bone union time did not differentiate two groups significantly.
4. In plated group, one nonunion and one radius refracture after union(plate removed state) were occurred.
5. Between the two operatio methods selected alternatively, immobilization period, radiologic bone union and functional results were not different significantly, but the Rush pinning method was preferred due to simple operation technique, small operation scars, short operation time, a little blood ioss, a few complications.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of Locking versus Dynamic Compression Plates for Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fracture Yong Chan Lee, Hong Je Kang Journal of the Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand.2015; 20(4): 168. CrossRef
Pediatric Forearm Bone Fractures Treated with Flexible Intramedullary Nail Suk Kyu Choo, Jin Hwan Kim, Hyung Keun Oh, Dong Hyun Kim Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(2): 190. CrossRef