Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > > Volume 8(4); 1995 > Article
Original Article
Clinical Comparison in Intramedullary Fixation to Plate Fixation on Treatment of the Both Forearm Bone Fractures
Seog Yeong Jeong, Ung Moon, Soo Jae Yim, Seung Ryeol Yoon, Soo Kyun Rah, Chang Uk Choi
Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures 1995;8(4):893-901.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1995.8.4.893
Published online: July 9, 2016

Department of Orthopaedic Surery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Gumi Hospital, Korea.

Copyright © The Korean Fracture Society

  • 33 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
prev next
  • The diaphyseal fractures of radius and ulnar have many problems like nonunion, malunion and functional disturbance with conservative treatment. Therefore, open anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation have been widely used. The plate fixation has been employed in most both forearm bone fractures and the intramedullary pinning usually used in cases of the open fractures, comminuted types, multiple fractures or poor general conditions. Seventeen patients were treated with semitubular plate and eighteen cases by the closed or open reduction and intramedullary fixation with Rush pin(the operation methods were decised alternatively) were followed up more than one year at Soonchunhyang Gumi Hospital from June 1988 to Nov. 1992 and the results were compared and analyzed clinically.
    1. Those two groups were demographically similar.
    2. The operation time was 65 minites in Rush pin group, 85.6 minutes in plate group and the blood loss was 37.1cc in Rush pin group,85.3cc in plate group.
    3. The immobilization period and the radiologic bone union time did not differentiate two groups significantly.
    4. In plated group, one nonunion and one radius refracture after union(plate removed state) were occurred.
    5. Between the two operatio methods selected alternatively, immobilization period, radiologic bone union and functional results were not different significantly, but the Rush pinning method was preferred due to simple operation technique, small operation scars, short operation time, a little blood ioss, a few complications.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Comparison of Locking versus Dynamic Compression Plates for Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fracture
      Yong Chan Lee, Hong Je Kang
      Journal of the Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand.2015; 20(4): 168.     CrossRef
    • Pediatric Forearm Bone Fractures Treated with Flexible Intramedullary Nail
      Suk Kyu Choo, Jin Hwan Kim, Hyung Keun Oh, Dong Hyun Kim
      Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(2): 190.     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Clinical Comparison in Intramedullary Fixation to Plate Fixation on Treatment of the Both Forearm Bone Fractures
      J Korean Soc Fract. 1995;8(4):893-901.   Published online October 31, 1995
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    We recommend
    Clinical Comparison in Intramedullary Fixation to Plate Fixation on Treatment of the Both Forearm Bone Fractures
    Clinical Comparison in Intramedullary Fixation to Plate Fixation on Treatment of the Both Forearm Bone Fractures

    J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures
    Close layer
    TOP