PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological results of the operative treatment of the acromioclavicular dislocation with a Wolter plate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed clinical and radiological data of twenty patients (mean age: 37 years) who underwent the operative treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation using a Wolter plate from September, 1999 to December, 2002 with minimum of five years follow-up (average 6 years 7 months). The clinical outcomes of twenty patients were evaluated by UCLA scoring and radiological results of fifteen patients with available radiograph were evaluated by Zanca view and stress view. RESULTS: The mean UCLA score was mean 33 points (range, 27~35) at final follow up. By clinical evaluation, twelve cases (60%) were excellent, six cases (30%) were good and two cases were poor (10%). By radiological evaluation, eight cases (54%) were excellent (without displacement), five cases (33%) were good (displacement <5 mm) and two cases (13%) were poor (displacement >5 mm). Erosive change in acromioclavicular joint was seen in poor case. CONCLUSION: Wolter plate fixation may be a useful modality for treating acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Great care should be taken to make the hook hole at the appropriate position during operation for long-term prognosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical outcomes of bending versus non-bending of the plate hook in acromioclavicular joint dislocation Min Su Joo, Hoi Young Kwon, Jeong Woo Kim Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow.2021; 24(4): 202. CrossRef
Clinical Comparison of Two Types of Hook Plate in Surgical Treatment of Acromioclavicular Dislocation - AO Hook Plate and Wolter Plate - Jea-Yeol Choi, Eugene Kim, Haw-Jae Jeong, Jin Whan Ahn, Hun-Kyu Shin, Se-Jin Park, Seung-Hee Lee, Jae-Wook Lee, Kyu-Bo Choi The Journal of the Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society.2012; 15(2): 123. CrossRef
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical result of the Wolter plate fixation for the acromioclavicular joint dislocation and the necessity of coracoclavicular ligament repair with the operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty three patients operated between January 2003 to September 2005 with over 6 months of follow-up period were studied. The Constant-Murley scoring system was administered on 6 months postoperatively and stress films were taken for the surveillance of acromioclavicular joint and coracoclavicular distance after plate removal. All patients were classified into two groups in that coracoclavicular ligament was repaired (10 cases) or not (13 cases) and the clinical indices described above were compared. RESULTS With the Wolter plate fixation for the acromioclavicular joint dislocations, 20 cases of Constant-Murley scores were more than 'good' except complicated 3 cases. The scores of the repaired group were 7 cases of excellent, 2 cases of good and 1 case of moderate to poor, and that of not-repaired group were 6 cases, 5 cases and 2 cases respectively. With mean coracoclavicular interspace on x-ray at postoperative 6 months, repaired group showed residual 9% of displacement from initial 194% but not-repaired group showed 28% from initial 188%. There's no statistically significant difference in clinical scores between two group (p=0.072) and neither was residual coracoclavicular interspace displacement (p=0.067). CONCLUSION Short term follow-up of Wolter plate fixation for the acromioclavicular dislocation showed acceptable clinical results and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups of repaired coracoclavicular ligaments and not repaired.
PURPOSE Acromioclavicular joint dislocation are frequently seen and various operation treatment modalities have been suggested. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results of two operative methods, Bosworth screw procedure and Wolter plate technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS We have analysed 30 patients with acromioclavicular dislocations, which had been treated by Bosworth screw & Wolter plate technique from June 1996 to February, 2002 with minimal 1 year follow up. All patients were assessed clinical and radiological results by ASES Score and UCLA Score. RESULTS Using the Shoulder evaluation scheme of ASES and UCLA Score at the one year follow up examination, 93.4% of the patients had excellent results in Wolter plate group. In Bosworth screw group, 4 complications such as loosening of the screw, or breakage of screw were seen. 2 complicated patients were over 40 years old and then conversions to Wolter plate operation was needed and obtained good results. CONCLUSION Bosworth procedure has a merit not to damage acromioclavicular joint, but the technique is difficult, sometimes may be encountered loss of fixation due to overcorrection and anterior displacement of the clavicle. However, Wolter plate implant provides enough stability for active postoperative physiotheraphy, and hence accelerates rehabilitation. Therefore, this technique is thought to be a good modality in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular seperation.