PURPOSE To compare the outcomes between T-locking compression plate (T-LCP) and external fixator (EF) for unstable distal radius intraarticular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analysed the results in 22 cases with T-LCP, 20 cases with EF. We evaluated the clinical results according to the Mayo Wrist Scoring System, radiographic results. RESULTS The mean score was 84.6 in the T-LCP group and 80.5 in the EF group respectively. Final radiographic measurements for the T-LCP group averaged 10.5 mm radial length, 21.7degrees radial inclination, 9.8degrees volar tilt and 0.25 mm intraarticular step-off. The EF group averaged 10.1 mm radial length, 20.3 degrees radial inclination, 6.3 degrees volar tilt and 0.73 mm intraarticular step-off. CONCLUSION Both groups showed satisfactory final clinical outcomes. But T-LCP group allowed return to daily living, resulting in early postsurgical wrist motion. By the anatomical reduction, final volar tilt, intraarticular step-off were statistically better in the T-LCP group.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparative Analysis of the Results of Fixed-angle versus Variable-angle Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Seung-Do Cha, Jai-Hyung Park, Hyung-Soo Kim, Soo-Tae Chung, Jeong-Hyun Yoo, Joo-Hak Kim, Jung-Hwan Park Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2012; 25(3): 197. CrossRef
Treatment for Unstable Distal Radius Fracture with Osteoporosis -Internal Fixation versus External Fixation- Jin Rok Oh, Tae Yean Cho, Sung Min Kwan Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(1): 76. CrossRef
PURPOSE To analyze the results of surgical treatment using external fixator for unstable intra-articular fracture of distal radius.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 38 cases of distal radius fracture from Mar. 1990 to Dec. 2000. The patients were followed up for average 18 months postoperatively. We compared the results of 22 cases, treated with open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF) to the results of 16 cases, treated with ORIF and external fixation. We evaluated the results of the mean loss of radial length, radial inclination, volar tilt and traumatic arthritis according to demerit point rating system above the Fernandez classification IV. RESULTS According to demerit point rating system, excellent to good results were obtained in 72.7% at ORIF and external fixator, compared to 43.8% at case of ORIF only. In the last follow up, the mean loss of radial length was 0.6mm in case of ORIF, but 0.4 mm in case of ORIF and external fixator, the mean loss of radial inclination was 2.3 and 1.5 degrees, the mean loss of volar tilt was 2.5 and 2.2 degrees, respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperative complications were developed in 9 cases. Malunion was in 4 cases of ORIF and external fixator, in 2 cases of ORIF. Metacarpal bone fracture was in 1 case of ORIF and external fixation. Traumatic arthritis was in 2 cases of ORIF. CONCLUSION Open reduction and internal fixation combined with external fixation was thought to be a better method than open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of unstable intra-articular fractures of the distal radius of the Fernandez classification IV and IV, because that was more comfortable and convenient to patients and was useful to prevent late displacement.
PURPOSE In the treatment of an unstable intraarticular distal radius fracture, we report the result of a retrospective study of reduction maintaining effect of external fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS During the period from May 1996 to May 1999, 19 patients 20 cases with AO type C2, C3 distal radius fracture were treated by external fixation and followed-up for 2 years or longer. Six had AO type C2 fracture, and fourteen type C3. We evaluated immediate postoperative & follow-up radiological evaluation by volar tilt, radial inclination, radial length difference. As combined treatment, additional reduction maintaining effect of bone graft or internal fixation was evaluated also. RESULT Mean reduction loss of 2 years or longer follow-up after external fixation was volar tilt 7.2 degrees, radial inclination 4.3 degrees, radial length 3.1 mm. As additional reduction maintaining effect, internal fixation had statistically significant effect(p <0.05)-especially radial length maintenance, but bone graft not significant. CONCLUSIONS In unstable intraarticular distal radius fracture, after open reduction or bone graft etc. for intraarticular anatomic reduction, we consider external fixation or combined internal fixation for reduction maintenance.
The distal radius fracture is one of the most common fracture in orthopedics, but their optimal treatment has not been delineated, especially in unstable intraarticular fracture.
The unstable intraarticular fracture is increasig due to high energy injury following industrialization and increasing traffic accidents.
The unstable intraarticular facture of the distal radius comprises distince subgroups that are difficult to manage and are associated with a high frequency of posttraumatic arthritis.
Authors treated 6 cases of unstable intraarticular fracture of distal radius using external fixator and minimal open reduction to improve anatomical and functional results.
Six patient were followed up more than one year (mean 19.3 month) and the patients were assessed functional results by Green and 0Briens score and anatomical results by Stewarts scale.
Using the external firator and minimal open reduction, is thought to be a useful method for treatment of unstable intraarticular fracture of the distal radius.