Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Cephalomedullary Nailing with an Additional Cannulated Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femur Fractures: Keong-Hwan Kim, Woo Dong Nam, Yeon Sik Heo, Gu-Hee Jung; J Korean Fract Soc 2024;37(1):22-29. Published online January 31, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2024.37.1.22

Abstract PDF: Purpose
The purpose of this study is to analyze the clinical results of patients with basicervical fracture undergoing cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) with an additional cannulated screw fixation compared to only performing CMN. We hypothesized that a difference may exist in the clinical outcomes if an ad-ditional screw is fixed with CMN compared to only performing CMN in basicervical fracture.
Materials and Methods
A total of 28 consecutive patients who underwent CMN for basicervical fracture were included. In 9 cases, only CMN was conducted, and in 19 cases, an additional cannulated screw fixation was performed with CMN. Bone union, sliding distance, reduction status, and fixation failure were evaluated by postoperative radiography, and ambulatory ability was evaluated by functional results. These findings were compared between a group of CMN and a group of CMN with an additional cannulated screw.
Results
There were 4 males and 24 females with a mean age of 84 years (range, 69–100 years). No significant difference was found in postoperative reduction, tip-apex distance, bone union, and walking function recovery after surgery between the two groups, but in the sliding distance of the lag screw, the CMN group demonstrated more sliding (6.2 mm [range, 2.5–13.4 mm] vs 3.5 mm [range, 0.1– 9.2 mm]; p=0.045). Among the two groups, only one case of fixation failure at the postoperative four months was observed in the CMN group (p=0.321), and hemiarthroplasty with nail construct removal was performed.
Conclusion
CMN with additional cannulated screw fixation is a safe and reliable surgical option in basicervical fracture. It provided favorable clinical outcomes and may be a good alternative for treating basicervical fracture.

948 View
14 Download

Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of Intertrochanteric Fracture Treatment Using TFNA (Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced): Hyeon Joon Lee, Hyun Bai Choi, Ba Rom Kim, Seung Hwan Jo, Sang Hong Lee; J Korean Fract Soc 2021;34(3):105-111. Published online July 31, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2021.34.3.105

Purpose
This study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of TFNA (Trochanteric Fixation NailAdvanced; Depuy Synthes) for the treatment of proximal femur fractures.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective study of 64 patients diagnosed with a proximal femur fracture from January 2019 to November 2019. The patient’s demographic data, preoperatively and postoperatively Koval grade, modified Harris hip score, EQ-5D (Euro-Qol-5 Dimension), sliding and advancement of the blade, radiologic outcome, and complications were investigated.
Results
Fifty patients were available for evaluation at one year postoperatively. The patients reported the following: the Koval grade decreased after surgery; the modified Harris hip score decreased from 78.56±8.88 to 72.74±6.59 (p=0.149); the mean EQ-5D decreased from 0.75±0.09 to 0.72±0.06 (p=0.000). Satisfactory reduction was achieved on a postoperative radiographic examination in 47 patients in six months. Complications occurred in seven cases.
Conclusion
TFNA is considered an appropriate implant for treating intertrochanteric fractures of the femur with a minimum follow-up of one year.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Outcomes of Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation Using the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced (TFNA): A Retrospective Analysis
Ramprasad Jasti, Prithvi Mohandas, Mahesh K Ragavan, Sunil D Magadam, Umesh Kannadasan
Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
GS Hip Nail versus Affixus Hip Fracture Nail for the Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures
Seungcheol Kwon, Minjae Lee, Heeyeon Lee, Jihyo Hwang
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(21): 6720. CrossRef
Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of TFNA (Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced) and PFNA-II (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-II) Treatment in Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures
Min Sung Kwon, Young Bok Kim, Gyu Min Kong
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2022; 35(4): 162. CrossRef

840 View
12 Download
3 Crossref

Breakage of Cephalomedullary Nail Used in the Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures: Case Report: Seok Hyun Kweon, Chang Hyun Shin, Jin Sung Park, Byoung San Choi; J Korean Fract Soc 2016;29(1):42-49. Published online January 31, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2016.29.1.42

Abstract PDF

Internal fixation using a cephalomedullary nail as treatment for proximal femur fracture has recently been popular for early ambulation and rehabilitation. However metal breakage at the lag screw insertion site was reported due to non-union, delayed-union, and early weight bearing. In our orthopedic department, we experienced 2 cases of nail breakage at the lag screw insertion site, therefore we report on evaluation of the cause of metal failure and prevention of complications with literature review.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Breakage of the Tail Portion of the Lag Screw during Removal of Proximal Femoral Zimmer Natural Nail: Report of Two Cases with Technical Notes
Asep Santoso, Ik-Sun Choi, Kyung-Soon Park, Taek-Rim Yoon
Hip & Pelvis.2017; 29(3): 199. CrossRef

576 View
2 Download
1 Crossref

The Treatment of Subtrochanteric Fracture with Cephallomedually Nail: Minimal Incision and Lowman Clamp Assisted Reduction: Jang Seok Choi, Do Hyun Moon, Young Tae Noh; J Korean Fract Soc 2011;24(4):301-306. Published online October 31, 2011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2011.24.4.301

Abstract PDF

PURPOSE
To evaluate the radiographic results of patients with subtrochanteric femoral fracture using minimal incision and cephalomedullary nail technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was performed on 54 patients, 54 cases of hip, recruited among patients who underwent minimal incision and Cephalomedullary nail from September 2005 to August 2008 and were available for 1-year or longer follow up. The gender ratio was 37 males and 17 females, and the mean age at the time of surgery was 57.4 years (range; 16~81 years). According to injury mechanism, traffic accident was 29 cases, fall down form high height was 18 cases, slip down was 7 cases. In classification by Seinsheimer, type II was 23 cases (m/c), type III was 18 cases, type IV was 13 cases. Average follow up period was 14 months (12~18). Radiographic evaluation was performed for time taking union, mal-union and complication.
RESULTS
53 of the 54 cases united. 39 of 54 reductions were anatomic. 19 fractures had a monir varus deformity of proximal fragment (between 2degrees and 5degrees). There was no varus deformity of more than 5degrees. 1 case that had been treated with PFN had nail breakage without trauma. There were no other complications.
CONCLUSION
Surgical treatment of subtrochanteric fractures with minimal incision and Cephalomedullary nail technique can reslut in excellent reduction without complications including inflammation & malunion. Careful attention to detail for using Lowman clamp is demanding to decrease soft tissue injury.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The Treatment of Subtrochanteric Fractures with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation
Chi Hyoung Pak, Sang Hong Lee, Sang Ho Ha, Gwang Chul Lee, Kyoung Chul Song
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(4): 284. CrossRef
Fixation of the Femoral Subtrochanteric Fracture with Minimally Invasive Reduction Techniques
Chul-Hyun Park, Chul-Wung Ha, Sang-Jin Park, Min-Su Ko, Oog-Jin Shon
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(2): 112. CrossRef

613 View
0 Download
2 Crossref

Search