Fig. 1Bone fracture augmentations with compressing plate (A), the arrow indicates the fracture gap at the bone fracture site (B), and the arrow indicates callus formation around the bone fracture site (C).
Fig. 2Test specimen with LC-DCP fixation system for validating the 3-D FEM model (A), the bone-plate fixation system 3-D FEM model (B), and the fracture gap sizes and widths (C).
Fig. 3Von Mises stress distributions and levels on the screws (A) and the plates (B) according to the changes of the fracture gap size and fracture gap width under compressive load.
Fig. 4Comparisons of peak von Mises stress (PVMS) according to the change of fracture gap size and width under the compressive load.
Fig. 5Comparisons of peak von Mises stress (PVMS) according to the change of fracture gap size and width under the torsional load.
Fig. 6Comparisons of peak von Mises stress (PVMS) according to the change of fracture gap size and width under the 4-point bending load.
Table 1Mechanical properties and component interface conditions assigned to FEA models