Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > > Volume 0; > Article
Review Article Teriparatide in fracture healing: biological rationale, clinical evidence, and current limitations
Won Ro Parkorcid, Han Eol Seoorcid, Min-Woo Kimorcid, Young-Min Nohorcid, Ban Seok Kimorcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jmt.2026.00304
Published online: October 16, 2026

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Busan Medical Center, Busan, Korea

Received: 19 August 2026   • Revised: 8 September 2026   • Accepted: 8 September 2026
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

Teriparatide is an osteoanabolic agent comprising the recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragment PTH(1–34) and has attracted interest as a pharmacological adjunct to fracture healing. This narrative review examines its use in acute fractures, delayed union, and nonunion by summarizing the biological rationale, preclinical evidence, clinical findings, and safety considerations. Intermittent administration of teriparatide activates PTH type 1 receptor signaling in osteoblast-lineage cells and osteocytes, promoting osteoblast differentiation and survival, suppressing sclerostin, and enhancing Wnt/β-catenin signaling to support bone matrix formation, mineralization, callus maturation, and remodeling. Preclinical studies, including those using experimental models of impaired fracture healing, have consistently demonstrated enhanced callus formation and mineralization and improved biomechanical recovery. Clinical evidence, however, is less consistent. Recent randomized studies and pooled analyses suggest that teriparatide may shorten the radiographic time to union in some fracture populations, particularly those with osteoporotic hip and pertrochanteric fractures. However, consistent benefits in terms of final union rate, pain, functional recovery, or revision surgery have not been demonstrated. Favorable radiographic and symptomatic outcomes have been reported in delayed union and nonunion, but the evidence comes mainly from case reports, small case series, and uncontrolled observational studies in which surgical or other supportive interventions frequently accompanied teriparatide treatment. Teriparatide should therefore not be regarded as a routine treatment for all fractures or as a replacement for adequate reduction, stable fixation, and infection control. It may have a role as an adjunct in selected clinical contexts involving reduced osteogenic capacity or an increased risk of impaired healing, although the optimal candidate population has not been established. Future prospective comparative studies should standardize patient selection, treatment initiation and duration, and the assessment of clinically relevant structural and functional outcomes.

  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Teriparatide in fracture healing: biological rationale, clinical evidence, and current limitations
    Close
Figure

J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures
Close layer
TOP