Abstract

• PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and compression hip screw on elderly with unstable intertrochanteric fractures We evaluated the clinical results of 65-year or older elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures between Jan. 1993 to Dec. 1997. 23 patients underwent compression hip screw treatment and 19 patients were treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Functional evaluation was conducted at 3, 6 and 12 month after the operation by hip rating scale of Merle d'Aubigne. Complications, time to weight bearing and hospitalization period were also investigated. RESULTS: For the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, functional scale of good or above were seen in 74%, 72% and 67% of the group at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. However in the compression hip screw group, the good or above results were shown in 57%, 52% and 43% of the group, thus showing a functional deterioration as time progresses. Comparing the overall clinical outcome, the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group showed better results, complication occurred in 26 cases of compression hip screw group and 8 cases of bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, showing better outcomes in the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. CONCLUSION: Comparing the length of hospital stay, time to weight bearing, complication and functional superiority of the treatment for elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures, the bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed superior clinical outcomes than the compression hip screw. Moreover, patients with more unstable fractures and more severe osteoporosis showed better clinical results with bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
• Key words: Femur, Unstable intertrochanteric fracture, Bipolar hemiarthroplasty, Compression hip screw

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by