Eun-Sun Moon; Myung-Sun Kim; Young-Jin Kim

doi:10.12671/jkfs.2007.20.3.239

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 20(3); 2007 > Article

Original Article
The Surgical Outcomes for Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fracture of Proximal Humerus: Eun-Sun Moon, M.D., Myung-Sun Kim, M.D., Young-Jin Kim, M.D.; Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2007;20(3):239-245.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2007.20.3.239
Published online: June 14, 2016

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Myung-Sun Kim, M.D. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University College of Medicine, 8, Hak-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-757, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-6336, Fax: 82-62-225-7794, rhamses@chol.com

108 Views
0 Download
2 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
To evaluate the adequate surgical methods and postoperative rehabilitation by analyzing the outcome of surgical treatment for isolated greater tuberosity fracture of proximal humerus.
Materials and Methods
Ten patients who allowed at least 1 year follow up after the surgical treatment of isolated greater tuberosity fractures were evaluated. Their mean age was 52.3 years (range, 28~67) and mean follow up duration was 23.8 months (range, 12~36). We choosed the different approaches and fixation methods according to size, location and presence of comminution of the fragment, and combined injury. The rehabilitation programs were indivisualized and we evaluated the clinical outcomes using UCLA and Constant scoring system.
Results
According to the UCLA scoring system, 5 cases were excellent, 3 cases were satisfactory, and 2 cases were unsatisfactory. By the Constant scoring system, 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The average bony union time was 7.6 weeks (range, 6~8) except the 2 cases of revision surgery. Two cases were operated using cannulated screws alone, 3 cases using only nonabsorbable sutures and 5 cases using cannulated screws and nonabsorbable sutures. One out of two revision cases was developed from the negligence of preoperative shoulder anterior dislocation with rupture of subscapularis, and the other was caused by improper immobilization of the fracture site postoperatively.
Conclusion
Not only the adequate surgical approaches and the fixation methods according to the size and comminution of fragment, but also the identification of combined injuries were very important in the surgical treatment for the isolated greater tuberosity fracture. And we considered that the adequate postoperative rehabilitation and proper protection based on the intraoperative fixation stability play an important role for the better clinical and radiological outcomes.
Key words: Greater tuberosity fracture, Surgical treatment, Fixation method, Rehabilitation

REFERENCES

1. Bigliani LU, Flatow EL. Acromioclavicular fractures of the proximal humerus. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, editors. The shoulder. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1998. p. 337-389.
2. Carrera EF, Matsumoto MH, Netto NA, Faloppa F. Fixation of greater tuberosity fractures. Arthroscopy, 2004;20:e109-e111.
3. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1987;214:160-164.Article
4. DePalma AF, Cautilli RA. Fractures of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop, 1961;20:73-93.
5. Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1986;68:1136-1144.
6. Flatow EL, Cuomo F, Maday MG, Miller SR, McIlveen SJ, Bigliani LU. Open reduction and internal fixation of two-part displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1991;73:1213-1218.
7. Green A, Izzi J. Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2003;12:641-649.
8. Kang HJ, Lee DH, Yoon HK, Hahn SB. Cannulated screw fixation for 4 part fractures of the neck of humerus. J Korean Fract Soc, 2005;18:432-436.
9. Kim E, Shin HK, Kim CH. Characteristics of an isolated greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus. J Orthop Sci, 2005;10:441-444.
10. Kim SH, Ha KI. Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic shoulders with minimally displaced greater tuberosity fracture. Arthroscopy, 2000;16:695-700.
11. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970;52:1077-1089.
12. Park TS, Choi IY, Kim YH, Park MR, Shon JH, Kim SI. A new suggestion for the treatment of minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus. Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 1997;56:171-176.
13. Platzer P, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Lehr S, Vecsei V, Gaebler C. The influence of displacement on shoulder function in patients with minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity. Injury, 2005;36:1185-1189.
14. Rockwood CA, Green DP. Fractures in adults. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2001. p. 1012-1017.
15. Schai PA, Hintermann B, Koris MJ. Preoperative arthroscopic assessment of fractures about the shoulder. Arthroscopy, 1999;15:827-835.
16. Shin DJ, Chang SA, Byun YS, Hwang DH, Lee SR, Kim SH. T-plate fixation for two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Korean Fract Soc, 2005;18:426-431.
17. Taverna E, Sansone V, Battistella F. Arthroscopic treatment for greater tuberosity fractures: rationale and surgical technique. Arthroscopy, 2004;20:e53-e57.

Fig. 1

(A) 46-year-old male and his initial anteroposterior and external rotational radiographs show isolated greater tuberosity fracture.

(B) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows fracture fixation using one cannulated screw through the deltopectoral approach.

(C) But, anterior shoulder dislocation was developed at postoperative 1 day.

(D) The initial anterposterior radiograph obtained from the local hospital shows the previous existence of anterior shoulder dislocation.

(E) MRI showed the complete subscapularis tear.

(F) At 2 years 8 months after fracture fixation using tension band suturing with nonabsorbable sutures and subscapularis repair with suture anchors, the radiograph shows good fracture healing.

Fig. 2

(A) 43-year-old female and her initial anteroposterior radiograph show isolated greater tuberosity fracture with anterior shoulder dislocation.

(B) After closed reduction, anteroposterior radiograph and CT scan were checked.

(C) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows the fracture fixation using two cannulated screws through the deltoid splitting approach.

(D) At postoperative 2 weeks, subarachnoid hemorrhage was developed and neurosurgery was performed. The follow up radiograph after neurosurgery shows fixation loss of fracture fragment.

(E) She underwent the revision surgery for greater tuberosity fracture using tension band suturing with nonabsorbable suture through the same approach and the radiograph at 3 year after operation shows good fracture healing.

Table 1

Patients demographics

^*M: Male, F: Female, ^†DL: Dislocation, Fx: Fracture, L3: Third lumbar vertebra.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical Features and Characteristics of Greater Tuberosity Fractures with or without Shoulder Dislocation
Dong-Wan Kim, Young-Jae Lim, Ki-Cheor Bae, Beom-Soo Kim, Yong-Ho Lee, Chul-Hyun Cho
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2018; 31(4): 139. CrossRef
The Surgical Outcomes of Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fractures of the Proximal Humerus Fixed with the Spring Plate
Dong-Ju Shin, Young-Soo Byun, Se-Ang Chang, Hee-Min Yun, Ho-Won Park, Jae-Young Park
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2009; 22(3): 159. CrossRef

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The Surgical Outcomes for Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fracture of Proximal Humerus

J Korean Fract Soc. 2007;20(3):239-245. Published online July 31, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2007.20.3.239

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

The Surgical Outcomes for Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fracture of Proximal Humerus

Fig. 1 (A) 46-year-old male and his initial anteroposterior and external rotational radiographs show isolated greater tuberosity fracture. (B) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows fracture fixation using one cannulated screw through the deltopectoral approach. (C) But, anterior shoulder dislocation was developed at postoperative 1 day. (D) The initial anterposterior radiograph obtained from the local hospital shows the previous existence of anterior shoulder dislocation. (E) MRI showed the complete subscapularis tear. (F) At 2 years 8 months after fracture fixation using tension band suturing with nonabsorbable sutures and subscapularis repair with suture anchors, the radiograph shows good fracture healing.

Fig. 2 (A) 43-year-old female and her initial anteroposterior radiograph show isolated greater tuberosity fracture with anterior shoulder dislocation. (B) After closed reduction, anteroposterior radiograph and CT scan were checked. (C) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows the fracture fixation using two cannulated screws through the deltoid splitting approach. (D) At postoperative 2 weeks, subarachnoid hemorrhage was developed and neurosurgery was performed. The follow up radiograph after neurosurgery shows fixation loss of fracture fragment. (E) She underwent the revision surgery for greater tuberosity fracture using tension band suturing with nonabsorbable suture through the same approach and the radiograph at 3 year after operation shows good fracture healing.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

The Surgical Outcomes for Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fracture of Proximal Humerus

Table 1

Patients demographics

^*M: Male, F: Female, ^†DL: Dislocation, Fx: Fracture, L3: Third lumbar vertebra.

Table 1 Patients demographics

^*M: Male, F: Female, ^†DL: Dislocation, Fx: Fracture, L3: Third lumbar vertebra.