Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > > Volume 14(2); 2001 > Article
Original Article
TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL TIBIA FRACTURE WITH HYBRID EXTERNAL FIXATOR
Tae Woo Park, Sung Do Cho, Youg Sun Cho, Bum Soo Kim, Sogu Lew, Su Yeon Hwang
Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures 2001;14(2):285-290.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2001.14.2.285
Published online: June 21, 2016

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.

bskim@uuh.ulsan.kr

Copyright © The Korean Fracture Society

  • 62 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next
  • PURPOSE: To evaluate the results and usefulness of hybrid external fixator in the treatment of proximal tibia fracture. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From Jan. 1997 to Jan. 2000, 19 proximal tibia fracture were treated with hybrid external fixator with or without limited internal fixation to stabilize the articular surface. All fractures were classified according to the AO classification. The results were analyzed by ROM(range of motion), bony union time, fracture reduction with MPTA(medial proximal tibial angle) and joint congruency. RESULT: There were 1 A2, 7 A3, 1 C1, 8 C2, 2 C3 proximal tibial fractures according to the AO classification. Open fractures were 10 patients. The mean bony union time was 13 wks(range 8-36wks) and the mean length of time in the external fixator was 14wks(range 8-36wks). At last follow up, the MPTA of the proximal tibia was 87.9 degree. 2 patients developed varus(82 degree) and valgus(92 degree) deformity respectively. Complications were intermittent pin drainage in 6 patients(31.6%), deep infection in 1 patient(5.3%) and nonunion in 4 patients(21%) required bone graft and internal fixation with plate at 6 months postoperatively. Four nonunions were 3 C2 and 1 C3 according to the AO classification and three were open fracture(1 type I, 1 type IIIb, 1 type IIIc : Gustilo type) CONCLUSION: Hybrid external fixation is a good treatment option for proximal tibial fractures. However, nonunion and angular deformity would occur in severe metaphyseal comminution and soft tissue injury. Accurate fracture reduction and careful soft tissue management is prerequisite and if necessory early bone graft should be considered in such cases.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Staged Management of High Energy Proximal Tibia Fractures with Severe Soft Tissue Damage
      Seung-Ryul Lee, Jae-Hoon Yang, June-Kyu Lee, Hyun-Dae Shin, Kyung-Cheon Kim, Kyu-Woong Yeon, Young-Mo Kim
      Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2009; 22(3): 152.     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL TIBIA FRACTURE WITH HYBRID EXTERNAL FIXATOR
      J Korean Soc Fract. 2001;14(2):285-290.   Published online April 30, 2001
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    We recommend
    TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL TIBIA FRACTURE WITH HYBRID EXTERNAL FIXATOR
    TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL TIBIA FRACTURE WITH HYBRID EXTERNAL FIXATOR

    J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures
    Close layer
    TOP