Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 22(2); 2009 > Article
Original Article
Crescent Fracture-dislocation of Sacroiliac Joint: Affecting Factors of Operative Results
Hee-Soo Kim, M.D., Chang-Wug Oh, M.D., Poong-Taek Kim, M.D., Young-Soo Byun, M.D., Joo-Woo Kim, M.D., Byung-Chul Park, M.D., Woo-Kie Min, M.D., Hyun-Joo Lee, M.D.
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2009;22(2):71-78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2009.22.2.71
Published online: April 30, 2009

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.

*Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daegu Veterans Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Chang-Wug Oh, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 101, Dongin-dong 2-ga, Jung-gu, Deagu 700-422, Korea. Tel: 82-53-420-5630, Fax: 82-53-422-6605, cwoh@knu.ac.kr
• Received: October 21, 2008   • Accepted: January 5, 2009

Copyright © 2014 The Korean Fracture Society. All rights reserved.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 40 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 2 Crossref
next
  • Purpose
    To assess the affecting factors of results after the operation of Crescent fracture-dislocation in sacro-iliac joint.
  • Materials and Methods
    In 19 patients (mean age, 47.4 year-old) of open reduction and internal fixation for Crescent fracture-dislocation, there were seven type I, 9 type II, and 3 type III fractures according to Day's classification. We assessed affecting factors of radiological and functional results, such as patients' ages, surgical approaches, the fixation extent of pelvic ring, and fracture patterns.
  • Results
    Seventeen of 19 cases united at 14.5 weeks in average, and 2 non-unions occurred with the fixation failure of posterior ring. Satisfactory results were 14 and 15 in radiological and functional evaluation, respectively. In complications, three cases of leg length discrepancy were from an imperfect reduction and two fixation failures. Surgical approach did not show any difference of results, but all cases of unsatisfactory reduction occurred from posterior ring fixation through the anterior approach. Fixation of both rings seemed to have satisfactory results, comparing to posterior ring only. Older patients over 60 year-old had more complications and a tendency to show an unsatisfactory result.
  • Conclusion
    In operative treatment of Crescent fracture-dislocation of sacro-iliac joint, it is better to fix both anterior and posterior rings. But, caution is needed to prevent complications in old-aged patients.
  • 1. Bellabarba C, Ricci WM, Bolhofner BR. Distraction external fixation in lateral compression pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2006;20:1 Suppl. S7-S14.
  • 2. Borrelli J Jr, Koval KJ, Helfet DL. The crescent fracture: a posterior fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint. J Orthop Trauma, 1996;10:165-170.
  • 3. Borrelli J Jr, Koval KJ, Helfet DL. Operative stabilization of fracture dislocations of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996;329:141-146.
  • 4. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma, 1990;30:848-856.
  • 5. Day AC, Kinmont C, Bircher MD, Kumar S. Crescent fracture-dislocation of the sacroiliac joint: a functional classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007;89:651-658.
  • 6. Ebraheim NA, Coombs R, Rusin JJ, Jackson WT, Holiday B. Percutaneous computed-tomography stabilization of pelvic fractures: preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma, 1987;1:197-204.
  • 7. Helfet DL. Open reduction internal fixation of the pelvis. Tech Orthop, 1990;4:67-78.
  • 8. Holdsworth FW. Dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1948;30:461-466.
  • 9. Kellam JF, McMurtry RY, Paley D, Tile M. The unstable pelvic fracture. Operative treatment. Orthop Clin North Am, 1987;18:25-41.
  • 10. Kim PT, Oh CW, Ihn JC, Kwun JD. The biomechanical study on the extraction strengths of iliosacral lag screws. J Korean Soc Fract, 2000;13:696-701.
  • 11. Lee JY, Moon DH, Kim GB. Prognosis of early internal fixation in unstable pelvic fractures. J Korean Soc Fract, 2000;13:741-748.
  • 12. Matta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989;242:83-97.
  • 13. Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Gänsslen A, Tscherne H. The hannover experience in the management of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994;305:69-80.
  • 14. Rommens PM, Hessmann MH. Staged reconstruction of pelvic ring disruption: differences in morbidity, mortality, radiologic results, and functional outcomes between B1, B2/B3, and C-type lesions. J Orthop Trauma, 2002;16:92-98.
  • 15. Routt ML Jr, Simonia PT, Mills WJ. Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma, 1997;11:584-589.
  • 16. Shaw JA, Mino DE, Werner FW, Murray DG. Posterior stabilization of pelvic fractures by use of threaded compression rods. Case reports and mechanical testing. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985;192:240-254.
  • 17. Simpson LA, Waddell JP, Leighton RK, Kellam JF, Tile M. Anterior approach and stabilization of the disrupted sacroiliac joint. J Trauma, 1987;27:1332-1339.
  • 18. Starr AJ, Walter JC, Harris RW, Reinert CM, Jones AL. Percutaneous screw fixation of fractures of the iliac wing and fracture-dislocations of the sacro-iliac joint (OTA Types 61-B2.2 and 61-B2.3, or Young-Burgess "lateral compression type II" pelvic fractures). J Orthop Trauma, 2002;16:116-123.
  • 19. Tile M. Pelvic fracture: operative versus non-operative treatment. Orthop Clin North Am, 1980;11:423-464.
  • 20. Tseng S, Tornetta P 3rd. Percutaneous management of morel-lavallee lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006;88:92-105.
Fig. 1
Classification of crescent fracture according to Day et al. The positions of the principal fracture lines are shown for crescent fracture-dislocation types I, II and III, as defined by axial CT sections, reformatted parallel to the sacroiliac superior end-plate.
jkfs-22-71-g001.jpg
Fig. 2
(Patient 2) (A, B) A 19-year-old woman had a lateral compression injury of the pelvic ring from the right side.
(C) A 3 dimensional CT scan shows the crescent fragment of iliac fracture (arrow).
(D) The axial film shows type I of Day classification.
jkfs-22-71-g002.jpg
Fig. 3
(Patient 2) (A, B) Through the anterior approach, anatomical reconstruction was achieved with the fixation of anterior and posterior rings.
(C, D) The fractures were united at 12 weeks.
jkfs-22-71-g003.jpg
Fig. 4
(Patient 14) (A, B) A 49-year-old man had a Type II of crescent fracture-dislocation.
(C) The fracture of posterior ring was fixed with three reconstruction-plates through the posterior approach.
(D) After 6 years, he had an excellent function with the union.
jkfs-22-71-g004.jpg
Fig. 5
(Patient 18) (A, B) A type III of crescent fracture-dislocation in a 50-year-old man.
(C) Although both ring were fixed, (D) the fracture displaced superiorly with screw failures (arrow) at 6 month later.
He showed a poor function with a leg length discrepancy.
jkfs-22-71-g005.jpg
Table 1
Patients data of crescent fracture-dislocation in pelvic ring
jkfs-22-71-i001.jpg

*Fixation between ilium and sacrum, IS screw: Ilio-sacral screw, LLD: Leg-length discrepancy, DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • General Assessment and Initial Management of Polytrauma Patients
      Hyoung Keun Oh
      Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(3): 230.     CrossRef
    • Damage Control and Provisional Fixation
      Hyoung Keun Oh
      Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(3): 346.     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Crescent Fracture-dislocation of Sacroiliac Joint: Affecting Factors of Operative Results
      J Korean Fract Soc. 2009;22(2):71-78.   Published online April 30, 2009
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    We recommend
    Crescent Fracture-dislocation of Sacroiliac Joint: Affecting Factors of Operative Results
    Image Image Image Image Image
    Fig. 1 Classification of crescent fracture according to Day et al. The positions of the principal fracture lines are shown for crescent fracture-dislocation types I, II and III, as defined by axial CT sections, reformatted parallel to the sacroiliac superior end-plate.
    Fig. 2 (Patient 2) (A, B) A 19-year-old woman had a lateral compression injury of the pelvic ring from the right side. (C) A 3 dimensional CT scan shows the crescent fragment of iliac fracture (arrow). (D) The axial film shows type I of Day classification.
    Fig. 3 (Patient 2) (A, B) Through the anterior approach, anatomical reconstruction was achieved with the fixation of anterior and posterior rings. (C, D) The fractures were united at 12 weeks.
    Fig. 4 (Patient 14) (A, B) A 49-year-old man had a Type II of crescent fracture-dislocation. (C) The fracture of posterior ring was fixed with three reconstruction-plates through the posterior approach. (D) After 6 years, he had an excellent function with the union.
    Fig. 5 (Patient 18) (A, B) A type III of crescent fracture-dislocation in a 50-year-old man. (C) Although both ring were fixed, (D) the fracture displaced superiorly with screw failures (arrow) at 6 month later. He showed a poor function with a leg length discrepancy.
    Crescent Fracture-dislocation of Sacroiliac Joint: Affecting Factors of Operative Results

    Patients data of crescent fracture-dislocation in pelvic ring

    *Fixation between ilium and sacrum, IS screw: Ilio-sacral screw, LLD: Leg-length discrepancy, DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.

    Table 1 Patients data of crescent fracture-dislocation in pelvic ring

    *Fixation between ilium and sacrum, IS screw: Ilio-sacral screw, LLD: Leg-length discrepancy, DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.


    J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
    Close layer
    TOP