Jin-Wan Kim; Young-Chul Ko; Chul-Young Jung; Il-Soo Eun; Hyeon-Soo Choi; Ok-Gul Kim; Young-June Kim

doi:10.12671/jkfs.2009.22.4.232

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 22(4); 2009 > Article

Original Article
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using the Greater Trochanter Reattachment Device (GTRD) for Comminuted Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in Elderly Patients: Jin-Wan Kim, M.D., Young-Chul Ko, M.D., Chul-Young Jung, M.D., Il-Soo Eun, M.D., Hyeon-Soo Choi, M.D., Ok-Gul Kim, M.D., Young-June Kim, M.D.; Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2009;22(4):232-238.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2009.22.4.232
Published online: October 30, 2009

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Busan Medical Center, Busan, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Young-Chul Ko, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Busan Medical Center, 1330, Geoje 2-dong, Yeonje-gu, Busan 611-706, Korea. Tel: 82-51-607-2862, Fax: 82-51-607-3001, drgo1973@nate.com

• Received: May 26, 2009 • Revised: July 21, 2009 • Accepted: August 27, 2009

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

45 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of the greater trochanter reattachment device (GTRD) as firm fixation method for displaced greater trochanter fragment in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for comminuted intertrochanteric femur fracture in elderly patients.
Materials and Methods
From January 2006 to January 2008, 32 patients above 70 years old treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty using the GTRD as fixation method for comminuted intertrochanteric femur fracture with greater trochanter bone fragment displaced above 1 cm. They were followed up for more than one year. Clinically, the postoperative Harris hip score (HHS) and daily activities of life of Johnston et al were evaluated, and radiological, any displacement of greater trocharter bone fragments and/or GTRD.
Results
The mean postoperative HHS was 71.6 (range, 53~82) points. In rating the daily activity of life, twenty seven (84.4%) patients' postoperative results were above fair. Two patients (6.3%) had displacement of the greater trochanter bone fragment above 1 cm. One patient had a deep infection, so we removed the bipolar head and inserted antibiotics-loaded cement block instead, and after the infection was controlled, conversion to total hip arthroplasty was done.
Conclusion
In bipolar hemiarthroplasty for comminuted intertrochanteric femur fracture with displaced greater trochanter bone fragment, GTRD produced satisfactory results and early rehabilitation.
Key words: Femur, Intertrochanteric fracture, Greater trochanter reattachment device, Bipolar hemiarthroplasty

REFERENCES

1. Bonamo JJ, Accettola AB. Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a sliding nail-plate. J Trauma, 1982;22:205-215.
2. Boyd HB, Graffin LL. Classification and treatment of trochanteric fractures. Arch Surg, 1949;58:853-866.
3. Chan KC, Gill GS. Cemented hemiarthroplasties for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000;371:206-215.
4. Donnelly WJ, Kobayashi A, Freeman MA, et al. Radiological and survival comparison of 4 methods of fixation of a proximal femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1997;79:351-360.
5. Gill JM, Johnson GR, Sher JL, Korrjoccan NA. Biomechanical aspects of the repair of intertrochanteric fractures. J Biomed Eng, 1989;11:235-239.
6. Haentjens P, Casteleyn PP, De Boeck H, Handelberg F, Opdecam P. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Primary bipolar arthroplasty compared with internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989;71:1214-1225.
7. Haentjens P, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P. Primary bipolar arthroplasty of total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Acta Orthop Belg, 1994;60:Suppl 1. 124-128.
8. Hamadouche M, Zniber B, Dumaine V, Kerboull M, Courpied JP. Reattachment of the ununited greater trochanter following total hip arthroplasty. The use of a trochanteric claw plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003;85:1330-1337.
9. Harper MC. The treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures using a sliding screw-medial displacement technique. J Trauma, 1982;22:792-796.
10. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1969;51:737-755.
11. Jensen JS, Sohne-Holm S, Tondevold E. Unstable trochanteric fractures. A comparative analysis of four methods of internal fixation. Acta Orthop Scand, 1980;51:949-962.
12. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RM Jr, Harris WH, Poss R, Müller M, Sledge CB. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990;72:161-168.
13. Kho DH, Shin JY, Kim KH, Lee JH, Kim DH. Trochanteric management for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture in the elderly patients. J Korean Fract Soc, 2007;20:129-134.
14. Kim WY, Han CH, Ji JH, Kim YY, Lee KS, Lee SW. Fixation for reattachment of trochanteric fragment in pertrochanteric fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc, 2006;18:67-72.
15. Koyama K, Higuchi F, Kubo M, Okawa T, Inoue A. Reattachment of the greater trochanter using the Dall-Miles cable grip system in revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci, 2001;6:22-27.
16. Lestrange NR. Bipolar arthroplasty for 496 hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1990;251:7-19.
17. Stern MB, Goldstein TB. The use of the leinbach prosthesis in intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1977;128:325-331.
18. Yoon ES, Min HJ, Suh JS, et al. Comparison of clinical results between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and compression hip screw on unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur in elderly patients. J Korean Fract Soc, 2004;17:214-220.

Fig. 1

Example of the GTRD: Apis grip plate® (Tradimedics).

Fig. 2

(A) Preoperative radiograph of a 80 year-old woman shows a comminuted intertrochanteric fracture (Body-Graffin type III).

(B) Follow-up radiograph 4 months after cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using GTRD.

Fig. 3

(A) Preoperative radiograph and 3-dimensional computed tomography of a 75 year-old man shows a comminuted intertrochanteric fracture (Body-Graffin type II).

(B) Postoperative radiograph shows cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using GTRD.

(C) After 7 weeks, bipolar head was removed and antibiotics-loaded cement block was inserted because deep infection occurred. After infection was controlled, cement block was removed and conversion to total hip arthroplasty was done.

(D) Follow-up radiograph 5 months after conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Fig. 4

(A) Preoperative radiograph of a 80 year-old woman shows a comminuted intertrochanteric fracture (Body-Graffin type II).

(B) Postoperative radiograph shows cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using GTRD.

(C) Follow-up radiograph after 5 months shows superior migration about 1 cm of greater trochanter fragment.

Table 1

Summary of cases

^*Fx. Type: Boyd-Graffin type, ^†DAL: Daily activity of life, ^‡HHS: Harris hip score, ^§Postop. Cx.: Postoperative complications, ^∥DM: Diabetes mellitus, ^¶HTN: Hypertension, ^**CVA: Cerebrovascular accident.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using the Greater Trochanter Reattachment Device (GTRD) for Comminuted Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in Elderly Patients

J Korean Fract Soc. 2009;22(4):232-238. Published online October 31, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2009.22.4.232

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using the Greater Trochanter Reattachment Device (GTRD) for Comminuted Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in Elderly Patients

Fig. 1 Example of the GTRD: Apis grip plate® (Tradimedics).

Fig. 2 (A) Preoperative radiograph of a 80 year-old woman shows a comminuted intertrochanteric fracture (Body-Graffin type III). (B) Follow-up radiograph 4 months after cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using GTRD.

Fig. 3 (A) Preoperative radiograph and 3-dimensional computed tomography of a 75 year-old man shows a comminuted intertrochanteric fracture (Body-Graffin type II). (B) Postoperative radiograph shows cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using GTRD. (C) After 7 weeks, bipolar head was removed and antibiotics-loaded cement block was inserted because deep infection occurred. After infection was controlled, cement block was removed and conversion to total hip arthroplasty was done. (D) Follow-up radiograph 5 months after conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Fig. 4 (A) Preoperative radiograph of a 80 year-old woman shows a comminuted intertrochanteric fracture (Body-Graffin type II). (B) Postoperative radiograph shows cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using GTRD. (C) Follow-up radiograph after 5 months shows superior migration about 1 cm of greater trochanter fragment.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using the Greater Trochanter Reattachment Device (GTRD) for Comminuted Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in Elderly Patients

Table 1

Summary of cases

Table 1 Summary of cases