PURPOSE Fractures of the acetabulum remain a major challenge to the orthopedic surgeons. Although the operative treatment for the complex fractures is preferred, inaccurate reduction and then incongruity of the hip joint lead to serious complication such as premature osteoarthritis. We evaluated the results of surgical and conservative treatment for acetabular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 1996 to March 2001, we reviewed 55 cases retrospectively. Posterior wall fracture (13 cases) was the most common by Letournel's classification and followed by both column fracture (10 cases). Causes of injuries included 41 cases of traffic accident and 8 cases of falling down. We divided the cases into an operation group (28 cases) and conservative group (27 cases) and evaluated the results as excellent, good, fair or poor according to Matta's clinical and radiological grade criteria. RESULTS Anatomical or satisfactory reduction was obtained in 22 cases of operative group and clinical results were excellent in 7 cases, good in 13 cases. Conservative group revealed excellent and good clinical results in 15 of 27 cases. CONCLUSION In cases of the displaced complex fractures, posterior wall fracture with instability and displaced fractures involving the weight bearing dome of the acetabulum, open reduction and internal fixation after accurate evaluation of the fracture pattern could allow earlier ROM exercise and have the result in better prognosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical Results of Surgical Treatment of Acetabular Fractures according to Quality of Reduction Sang-Hong Lee, Min-Kyu Shin, Sueng-Hwan Jo The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2007; 42(2): 153. CrossRef
PURPOSE : To evaluate the results of the treatment of distal tibial fracture using ring or hybrid ring external fixator and to compare the results according to the influencing factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS : The authors analized 30 patients, 31 cases of distal tibial fracture who were treated by Ilizarov ring external fixator or hybrid ring external fixator at our hospital from May 1996 to August 1998 and were followed up over 1 year. The type of distal tibial fractrue were classified according to AO group, type A was 7 cases, and type C was 24(C1:5, C2:4, C3:15)cases. Restoration of articular surface of the distal tibia was performed through closed method or minimal invasive technique by minimal internal fixation with K-wire or screw. Then fixation of th distal tibia was done by ring external with multiple transfixing wire. Connection to the tibial shaft was done by Ilizarov ring external fixator(15 cases), or mono-external fixator(Dyna-Extor, 16 cases). RESULTS : By Tornetta's assessment of functional results, excellent was 5, good 19, fair 4 and poor 3cases. According to AO classification, the functional results of type A, 7cases were all above good results, among 24 cases of type C, 4cases of C1, 2 cases of C2, and 11 cases of C3 were above good results and there was no statistical difference between the results and the fracture type(P=0.024). One of 3 cases of poor functional results was open type C3 fracture and was complicated with osteomyelitis and refracture, and others two cases type C2 fracture which were complicated with malunion. CONCLUSION : The authors had a good results without soft tissue complication after the treatment of distal tibial fracture patients by Ilizarov ring external fixator or hybrid ring external fixator.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Mid-term Results of Distal Tibial Fractures Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator Suk Kyu Choo, Kyung Wook Nha, Hyoung Keun Oh, Dong Bong Lee Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(4): 323. CrossRef