PURPOSE We retrospectively analysed the result of retrograde supracondylar nail fixation in femur supracondylar fractures and evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this method. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since October 1998 we have treated 14 supracondylar fractures (AO type: A2-6, A3-1, C1-3 and C2-4) by retrograde intramedullary nailing technique through trans-patellar tendon approach from October 1998 to June 2001 and followed more than 1 year. RESULTS Among 14 cases, 5 cases were excellent, 6 good, 3 fair according to Schatzker functional result. The complications were 1 distal locking screw loosening, 1 delayed union and 1 fracture around proximal locking site. CONCLUSION Even though the retrograde nailing may damage the knee joint because it is inserted by opening up the joint, it provided the necessary stable fixation with short operation time, low blood loss, minimal soft tissue injury. Thus we believe that retrograde nailing is useful operative technique for the management of supracondylar fracture in osteoporotic, communited fractures, or open fractures.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Retrograde Nailing for Supracondylar Fracture after Total Knee Replacement: The Compatibility of Femoral Implant with Supracondylar Nail Moon-Jib Yoo, You-Jin Kim, Jin-Won Lee Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2008; 21(1): 19. CrossRef
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to analyse the result of operative treatment in ipsilateral femur neck and shaft fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eleven cases of ipsilateral femur neck and shaft fractures were operated and followed more than 1 year. There were 11 men and the mean age at index operation was 38 years (range 22~54). In neck fracture there were 3 of type I, 6 of type II, and 1 of type III according to Garden classification, shaft fractures were located at middle 1/3(7 cases), at distal 1/3(4 cases). We evaluate the operation time, union time, nonunion, malunion, and clinical evaluation with pain and joint stiffness. RESULTS In neck fractures treatment methods were 8 of multiple pinning, 2 of reconstruction nail and 1 of CHS, in shaft fractures 2 of DCP, 7 of retrograde nailing (3 Ender nail, 4 interlocking nail). The mean operation time was 180 minutes in reconstruction nail, 220 minutes in multiple pinning and DCP and 200 minutes in multiple pinning and retrograde nailing. The mean time for shaft union was 5 months. The complications were 1 case of neck reduction loss during operation in reconstruction nailing group, 2 of aseptic necrosis of femur head, 2 of shaft nonunion in retrograde nailing group, 1 of persistant pain around knee in Ender nailing group. CONCLUSION The author think that reconstruction nail fixation is technically difficult, thus neck and shaft fracture be fixed individually. Neck fracture can be fixed first without difficulty and shaft fracture should be fixed rigidly due to comminution.