PURPOSE To evaluate the results of fracture fixation between using Proximal Femoral Nail and using Proximal Femoral Nail A and to analyze the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail A. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed 32 patients who suffered from intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital, which were 19 cases of PFN and 13 cases of PFNA. Retrospectively we evaluated mean operation time, amount of bleeding, beginning of ambulation, average union period, changes of neck shaft angle and complication on set of telephone interview and OPD. We also evaluated postoperative capability of function and mobility using 'Social function score' and 'Mobility score'. RESULTS PFNA showed shorter mean operation time, less bleeding, shorter average union period, earlier ambulation and less change of neck shaft angle than PFN. Although they didn't show statistical difference, postoperative capability of function and mobility showed statistical and mathematical difference on each group. CONCLUSION PFNA showed better results of postoperative function and mobility and less complications than PFN. So treatment using PFNA is better method than that of PFN.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Treatment of the Proximal Femoral Fracture Using the New Design Cephalomedullary Nail: Prospective Outcomes Study Young Ho Roh, Joseph Rho, Kwang Woo Nam Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2019; 32(1): 35. CrossRef
Comparative Study of Intertrochanteric Fracture Treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation and the Third Generation of Gamma Nail Jae-Cheon Sim, Tae-Ho Kim, Ki-Do Hong, Sung-Sik Ha, Jong-Seong Lee Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(1): 37. CrossRef
Comparative Study of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Zimmer Natural Nail for the Treatment of Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures Jee-Hoon Kim, Oog-Jin Shon Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(4): 305. CrossRef
Helical Blade versus Lag Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture Kwang-Jun Oh, Sung-Tae Lee, Suk-Ha Lee, Jin-Ho Hwang, Min-Suk Kang Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(1): 6. CrossRef
Treatment of the Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation: Comparison with Compression Hip Screw with Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate Tae-Ho Kim, Jong-Oh Kim, Seung-Yup Lee, Geon-Ung Yun Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(4): 353. CrossRef
Comparison of the Compression Hip Screw (CHS) and the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture Jong Min Lim, Jeung Il Kim, Jong Seok Oh, Kuen Tak Suh, Jae Min Ahn, Dong Joon Kang Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(4): 360. CrossRef
We report an unusual case of Kirschner wire migration from the proximal humerus into the thoracic cavity and diaphragm which induced pneumothorax and hemoperitoneum. An 81-year-old woman admitted to the emergency room due to sudden onset of dyspnea. X-rays showed pneumothorax and old proximal humerus fracture fixed with rush pins and K-wires. One of K-wires was seen on the diaphragm level at posterior gutter of chest wall. Through the abdomen, K-wire was removed from the diaphragm and a chest tube was inserted. The potential for K-wires to migrate must be recognized, and frequent postoperative radiographic studies have to be performed for the early detection of loosening and migration. It appears that if K-wires are used for fixation of proximal humerus, the lateral ends must be bent to prevent medial migration, and when the desired therapeutic goals have been achieved, these pins have to be susbsequently removed as soon as possible.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Spinal Canal Migration of a K-Wire Used for Fixation of a Distal Clavicular Fracture Byung-Ill Lee, Yong-Beom Kim, Hyung-Suk Choi, Chang-Hyun Kim, Jung-Woo Ji Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2013; 48(3): 231. CrossRef
Early Intrathoracic Migration of K-wire Used for Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fracture Sang Jin Cheon, Ji Min Lee Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2011; 46(2): 167. CrossRef