PURPOSE This study was performed to reevaluate the radiological parameters for assessing the length of the distal fibula in the mortise view of the ankle and to introduce a more reliable method to lessen measurement error. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mortise view radiographs of 36 normal ankles from 18 healthy volunteers were obtained. The talocrural angle and bimalleolar angle were measured two times and compared bilaterally by two independent observers. Also, The lateral malleolar angle, newly devised in our department was measured and compared bilaterally. RESULTS The average of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 78.4 degrees (range 74 to 83), 78.3 degrees (range 73 to 86), and 36.7 degrees (range 30 to 41), respectively. The difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle between right and left was 2.1 degrees, 3.0 degrees, and 1.2 degrees (95% confidence limit), respectively. Intraobsever difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 1.5 degrees, 1.6 degrees, and 0.4 degrees, respectively. Interobsever difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 1.3 degrees, 2.4 degrees, and 1.0 degrees, respectively. CONCLUSION When using various measurement methods to judge the length of the distal fibula, the measurement error should be considered. The proposed method, lateral malleolar angle, would be a good method for assessing the length of distal fibula in the mortise view of ankle.
PURPOSE This retrospective study was performed to know the difficulties and efficient methods of treatment after several types of operations for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirteen cases (12 patients) with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture at the mean age of 36.6(range 21-51), have been followed up over the minimum of one year. All the patients suffered from motor vehicle accidents(11 in dash-board injury), and most of patients associated with multiple injuries including other fractures. All of femoral neck fracture were same type in basicervical area and 4 of them were missed initially. According to the classification of femoral shaft fractures, middle 1/3 fracture was most common in 10 cases and type C in 8 cases. In neck fractures, all cases were treated with multiple pinning, but in shaft fractures, 6 were treated by open plating, 5 by closed antegrade nailing, and 2 by retrograde nailing. RESULTS The mean union period was 12.1 weeks in neck fractures and 9.9 months in shaft fractures. In complications, there were 1 case of nonunion and 1 case of avascular necrosis in neck fractures, and 8 of delayed union, 3 of nonunion, and 2 of malunion, in shaft fractures. The methods of treatment had no influence on the results of this injury, but we had 1 failure in antegrade nailing prior to operation of neck fracture. CONCLUSION After operation of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture, the shaft fracture needed longer time of union and had many problems in spite of different methods. We suppose that many problems in shaft are affected not only by characteristic mechanism of injury, but also by multiple associated injury.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Treatment for Concurrent Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures Using Reconstruction Nail with Temporary K-Wires Sang-Joon Lee, Sang Hong Lee, Sang Ho Ha, Gwang-Chul Lee Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2015; 28(1): 23. CrossRef
Comparison of Operative Methods between Retrograde and Antegrade Nailing for Ipsilateral Femoral Shaft and Neck Fracture Chang-Wug Oh, Jong-Keon Oh, Woo-Kie Min, Shin-Yoon Kim, Seung-Hoon Baek, Byung-Chul Park, Hyung-Soo Ahn, Tae-Gong Kim Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(2): 135. CrossRef
Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing for the Treatment of Ipsilateral Femoral Shaft and Neck Fracture Chang-Wug Oh, Jong-Keon Oh, Shin-Yoon Kim, Ki-Bong Cha, In-Ho Jeon, Byung-Chul Park, Woo-Kie Min, Tae-Gong Kim The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2007; 42(3): 380. CrossRef