Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Operative Treatment of Traumatic Humeral Shaft Fracture: Comparision of Interlocking IM Nailing and Plate Fixation by Posterior Approach: Hyun Dae Shin, Kwang Jin Rhee, Kyung Cheon Kim, Ho Sup Song; J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18(2):93-99. Published online April 30, 2005; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2005.18.2.93

PURPOSE
To compare the results and complications of interlocking IM nailing and plate fixation by posterior approach in the treatment of traumatic humeral shaft fracture MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1997 to March 2003, 49 patients undergone operation due to traumatic humeral shaft fracture. Follow-up was over one year. 28 patients operated with interlocking IM nailing initially and 21 operated with plate fixation by posterior approach prospectively. Statistics were compared using clinical and radiological outcomes and complications.
RESULTS
Radiologically, bone union was observed after an average of 14.3 weeks in IM nailing, and 11.7 weeks in plate fixation. So plate fixation showed earlier bone union (p=0.012). Nonunion occurred in 4 cases (14.3%) operated with IM nailing, and 1 case (4.8%), that was open shaft fracture, with plate fixation. Nonunion occurred more frequently when operated by IM nailing. 6 cases showed limitation of shoulder movement due to damage of the rotator cuff by IM nail entry site. 1 case showed radial nerve palsy, and 1 case showed axillary nerve palsy in the case of IM nailing. Also, secondary surgery due to complications was operated in 9 cases (32.1%) in IM nailing and 1 case (4.8%) in plate fixation (p=0.03).
CONCLUSION
In the case of traumatic humeral shaft fracture plate fixation by posterior approach was more useful than IM nailing in the decrease of complications and bone union. Such approach is thought to be an excellent method for anatomic reduction and nerve exploration in the case of open and comminuted fracture which accompany nerve injuries

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical and Radiographical Follow-up for Residual Displacement of Fracture Fragments after Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing in Humeral Shaft Fractures
Jae-Kwang Yum, Dong-Ju Lim, Eui-Yub Jung, Su-Een Sohn
The Journal of the Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society.2013; 16(2): 107. CrossRef
Minimally Invasive Anterior Plating of Humeral Shaft Fractures
Hyun-Joo Lee, Chang-Wug Oh, Do-Hyung Kim, Kyung-Hyun Park
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2011; 24(4): 341. CrossRef
Result of Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing for Humeral Shaft Fracture Evaluation of Post-operative Shoulder Function
Seung Rim Park, Tong Joo Lee, Ryuh Sub Kim, Kyoung Ho Moon, Dong Seok You
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(2): 166. CrossRef

148 View
0 Download
3 Crossref

The Fate of Large Butterfly Fragments in Femoral Shaft Comminuted Fractures Treated withClosed Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing: Keun Bae Lee, Jae Yoon Chung, Eun Sun Moon, Eun Kyoo Song, Kwang Cheul Jeong; J Korean Soc Fract 2002;15(4):504-510. Published online October 31, 2002; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2002.15.4.504

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To evaluate the radiographic changes and union of large butterfly fragments after closed interlocking IM nailing for femoral shaft comminuted fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The objects of this study were 23 cases(15 males, 8 females) of femoral shaft comminuted fractures with butterfly fragments larger than 5cm and with the follow up period of 12 months or more from June 1995 to June 2000. We assessed the size, the degrees of displacement and angulation of the large butterfly fragments at preoperatively, one day, one month and three month postoperatively and evaluated the union at four month and six month postoperatively.
RESULTS
The size of the fragments was 8.4cm (5.0-13.0) in average. The distance between the fragment and shaft was 15.9cm preoperatively and 10.1, 7.7, 6.8cm at one day, one month and three month postoperatively. In 13 cases of angulation over 5 degrees, it changed from 19.6 degrees preoperatively to 13.9 degrees , 8.4 degrees , 5 . 9 degrees at one day, one month and three month postoperatively. There is no increase in angulation.The union was completed at 4 months in 13 cases (56.5%) and at 6 months in all except one case of delayed union, in which we did not do any further procedure until the union was achieved.
CONCLUSION
In femoral shaft comminuted fractures with displaced large butterfly fragments treated with closed interlocking IM nailing, the distance and angulation of fragments decreased gradually and even the fragments were inverted or largely displaced and angulated the fragments were united. So the caution must be given not to displace the fragments intraoperatively and to keep anatomical position of the fragments by active exercise and hydrostatic pressure of the muscles of thigh postoperatively. Then the open reduction and internal fixations of the fragments will not be necessary.

131 View
0 Download

Problems and complication after Interlocking Intramedullar Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fracture: In Suk Oh, Do Hyun Moon, Jin Hong Ko, Ki Dong Kang, Si Hwan Kim; J Korean Soc Fract 1996;9(3):547-556. Published online July 31, 1996; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1996.9.3.547

Abstract PDF

Fracture of the femoral shaft, is among most common fractures in orthopaedics, with its aspect becomming more complex. Since the introduction of Kuncher Nail, closed rodding techinque and locking nail system were followed with additional feature of preventing shortening and rotation as well as allowing early weight bearing and joint motion. With their wide application, we met many problems during the operative procedure due to delicient concept and technique. We have checked the possible problems during and after the procedure of interlocking nailing for the femoral fractures in 65 cases. 1. With poor selection of implant, long, short and small nail were used in 5, 3 & 2 cases, respectively. 2. In the process of operation, inlet error, angular & rotational deformity, femoral neck fracture, failure (or loossening) of distal screws were 2,10, 1, and 4 cases, respectively. 3. A New fragment was made in 7 cases(11%) durinbg surgery, especially medial side and distal to the fracture line. 4. Post-operative deep infection were developed in 2 cases. 5. Post-operative metal failure and delayed(or non) union was 1 and 7(11%) cases, delayed union (or nonunion) occured in 3 cases(20%) after open reduction while following closed reduction in 4 cases(8%).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Iatrogenic Femur Proximal Shaft Fracture during Nailing Using Lateral Entry Portal on Femur Shaft Fracture
Hong Moon Sohn, Gwang Chul Lee, Chae Won Lim
Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2014; 49(4): 272. CrossRef

155 View
0 Download
1 Crossref

Treatment of Nonunion of the Tibia Fracture: Dong Heon Kim, Kyu Cheol Shin, Hee Cheol Park, Ju Yong Shin; J Korean Soc Fract 1996;9(1):112-118. Published online January 31, 1996; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1996.9.1.112

Abstract PDF: Nonunion after tibia fracture is a relatively common problem. The cases of nonunion have been known open and comunited fracture, extensive soft tissue injury, interposition of the soft tissue, distarbance of the blood supply and inadequate fixation. A number of methods stimulating union have born described. These include fibular osteotomy followed by weight-bearing in a cast, autogenous boone graft with or without additional stabilization, internal or external fixation with compression, open or closed IM nailing and even electromagetic stimulation. In this paper we carried out retrospective study of the 24 nonunion of the tibia fracture which were treated at the Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Kon-Kuk University Hospital from March 1990 to March 1995. The results were as follows: 1. Among 24 cases of monunions, 16cases(66.6%) were communited fractures and 18cases(75%) were open fractures. 2. Hypervascular nonunion were 12cases and avascular nonunion were 12cases. Previous methods of treatinent were conservative treatment in 6cases of closed fracture and were treated with Ender nailing, multiple K-wire fixation, Ilizarolr external fixation, monofixator external fixation in 1 Bcases of open fractures. 3. The average duration from injury to dignosis of nonunion was 7 months tweets.(Range 5 months to 24months) 4. Tibial nonunion were treated with plate and screw with bone graft(Bcases), Interlocking IM nail ing(14cases), and nizarov external fixation with bone graft(teases). 5. The average time of union was 23weeks in all patients: 24 weeks in the case of plate and screw with bone graft. 20 weeks in the case of interlocking IM nailing. 28 weeks in the case Ilizarov external fixation with bone graft. 6. The main complications were joint stiffness due to long-term cast irnrnobiliBation in the case of plate and screw with bone graft, LROM of joint contracture and external pin site in the case of Ilizarov external fixation with bone graft, deep infection Icase and knee joint pain teases due to proximal nail protrusion in the case of Interlocking IM nailing.

139 View
0 Download

Delayed Femoral Neck Fracture in Interlocking Intramedullary Nailed Femur: A case report: Sung Man Rowe, Eun Sun Moon, Eun Kyoo Song, Sung Taek Jung; J Korean Soc Fract 1989;2(2):269-273. Published online November 30, 1989; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1989.2.2.269

Abstract PDF: We report an uncommon complication following interlocking intramedullary nailing of the femur: delayed femoral neck fracture after 5 months of unevenful postoperative course. He was a 47-year-old laborer with good quality of bone, nevertheless he sustained femoral neck fracture after minor fall on the ground. We thought that loss of bone elasticity caused by interlocked nail in the whole femoral shaft including intertrochanteric portion made stress concentration on the femoral neck to develop a fracture with minor magnitude of traumatic force.

134 View
0 Download

Search