Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Original Articles

Treatment of the Clavicle Lateral End Fracture by Kirschner wire and Wire fixation: Jin Woo Kwon, Seung Ho Shin, Won Ho Cho, Woo Se Lee, Ki Hwan Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Chun Ho Kim; J Korean Soc Fract 2001;14(2):214-222. Published online April 30, 2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2001.14.2.214

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Kirschner wire and additional wire fixation in clavicle lateral end fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We reviewed 14 cases that were treated by Kirschner wire and wire fixation from January 1997 to May 1999 and followed up for more than 1 year. Average age was 42 years old(male 6, female 8). The fractures were classified according to Jager and Breitner classification : 2 cases of type 1, 5 of type 2a, 5 of type 2b, 2 of type 3. We used 3 types of fixation method : First, interfragment Kirschner wire and wire fixation in simple fracture. Second, first method was reinforced with transacromial Kirschner wire fixation in simple, but osteoporotic bone. Third, fracture was fixed by transacromial Kirschner wire and wire fixation in intraarticular or comminuted fracture.
RESULTS
Bony union was obtained in all cases with average duration of 10 weeks. The functional result of shoulder was evaluated by the scoring system of Rowe : exellent 8, good 5, fair 1 case. The complications were pin migration 2, pin infection 1, shoulder LOM 3, traumatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis 2 cases.
CONCLUSION
Appropriate use of three types of Kirschner wire and wire fixation technique according to location of fracture, degree of comminution can improve bony union rate and shoulder function.

Radiologic Pattern of Trochlear Ossification Center: Jin Woo Kwon, Seung Ho Shin, Won Ho Cho, Woo Se Lee, Chun Ho Kim; J Korean Soc Fract 2000;13(2):216-221. Published online April 30, 2000; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2000.13.2.216

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
: The trochlear secondary ossification center may be variable in number, shape and size, thus it can be considered as fracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiographic analysis of normal trochlear secondary ossification center.
METHOD
AND MATERIAL : We reviewed the 100 cases of normal elbow radiographs and classified the numbers and shapes of trochlear sencondary ossification center.
RESULT
: The number of trochear secondary ossification center was that one was 72 cases(72%), two 19 cases(19%), three 9 cases(9%). The shape of trochlear ossification center which has only one ossification center was classified as round was 11cases(15.3%), elliptical 24 cases(33.3%), irregular37(51.4%).
CONCLUSION
: The radiographic finding of trochlear secondary ossification center is variable in number, size and shape, thus authors concluded that fragmentation or bizzare shape of trochlea in painless elbow must be considered as secondary ossification center.

Search