Use of a Distraction Dynamic External Fixator in the Treatment of Comminuted Middle Phalanx Base Fractures

Article information

J Musculoskelet Trauma. 2019;32(1):1-5
Publication date (electronic) : 2019 January 10
doi : https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2019.32.1.1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
Correspondence to: Chae Chil Lee, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan 44033, Korea Tel: +82-52-250-7129 Fax: +82-52-235-2823 E-mail: lunarticguy@naver.com
Received 2017 August 31; Revised 2018 May 30; Accepted 2018 September 28.

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose

This paper suggests the use of distraction dynamic external fixators (DDEF) for the treatment of proximal middle phalanx fractures.

Materials and Methods

Seven patients, who were diagnosed with comminuted intraarticular fractures at the base of the middle phalanx from February 2014 to November 2016, were enrolled in this study (volar aspect 6 cases, dorsal aspect 1 case). They underwent a closed reduction under a C-arm image intensifier, and DDEF was applied with general anesthesia. Range of motion (ROM) exercise was encouraged after 3 to 5 days postoperatively, and DDEF was removed after 5 weeks. Subluxation, angulation and displacement were evaluated 6 weeks postoperatively.

Results

The patients who were treated with DDEF showed a normal proximal interphalangeal joint ROM (100o), and there was no subluxation or displacement on the X-ray film 6 weeks postoperatively. In addition, there were no signs of infection, such as local heat, redness, and pus-like discharge.

Conclusion

DDEF helps maintain the reduction and reducing forces through the ligamentotaxis. The joint stiffness is reduced, which it makes early return to daily life easier.

Fig. 1.

Close-up X-ray image of the subluxation of proximal interphalangeal joint and suspected injury to the ulnar collateral ligament.

Fig. 2.

Close-up X-ray image of distraction dynamic external fixator applied to subluxation of the proximal interphalangeal joint.

Fig. 3.

Medical photograph of a patient who applied distraction dynamic external fixator at 3 days after operation.

Fig. 4.

Medical photograph of a patient who applied distraction dynamic external fixator. Range of motion exercise was encouraged 3 to 5 days after surgery.

Fig. 5.

Medical photograph of a patient applied distraction dynamic external fixator at 5 weeks after operation.

Fig. 6.

Medical photograph of a patient applied distraction dynamic external fixator. The external fixator was removed after 5 weeks.

Demographics and Summary of the Results

References

1. Zemel NP, Stark HH. Problem fractures and dislocations of the hand. Instr Course Lect 37:235–249. 1988;
2. Lee JY, Teoh LC. Dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint treated by open reduction and interfragmentary screw fixation: indications, approaches, and results. J Hand Surg Br 31:138–146. 2006;
3. McElfresh BC, Dobyns JH, O'Brien ET. Management of fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joints by extension-block splinting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:1705–1711. 1972;
4. Suzuki Y, Matsunaga T, Sato S, Yokoi T. The pins and rubbers traction system for treatment of comminuted intraarticular fractures and fracture-dislocations in the hand. J Hand Surg Br 19:98–107. 1994;
5. Ruland RT, Hogan CJ, Cannon DL, Slade JF. Use of dynamic distraction external fixation for unstable fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal Joint. J Hand Surg Am 33:19–25. 2007;
6. Mansha M, Miranda S. Early results of a simple distraction dynamic external fixator in management of comminuted intraarticular fractures of base of middle phalanx. J Hand Microsurg 5:63–67. 2013;
7. Schenck RR. Dynamic traction and early passive movement for fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 11:850–858. 1986;
8. Agee JM. Unstable fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Treatment with the force couple splint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:101–112. 1987;
9. Fahmy NR, Harvey RA. The “S” quattro in the management of fractures in the hand. J Hand Surg Br 17:321–331. 1992;
10. Hamilton SC, Stern PJ, Fassler PR, Kiefhaber TR. Mini-screw fixation for the treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint dorsal fracture-dislocations. J Hand Surg Am 8:1349–1354. 2006;
11. Salter RB. The physiologic basis of continuous passive motion for articular cartilage healing and regeneration. Hand Clin 10:211–219. 1994;
12. Johnson D, Tiernan E, Richards AM, Cole RP. Dynamic external fixation for complex intraarticular phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg Br 29:76–81. 2004;
13. Krakauer JD, Stern PJ. Hinged device for fractures involving the proximal interphalangeal joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 327:29–37. 1996;
14. Ellis SJ, Cheng R, Prokopis P, et al. Treatment of proximal interphalangeal dorsal fracture-dislocation injuries with dynamic external fixation: a pins and rubber band system. J Hand Surg Am 32:1242–1250. 2007;

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Close-up X-ray image of the subluxation of proximal interphalangeal joint and suspected injury to the ulnar collateral ligament.

Fig. 2.

Close-up X-ray image of distraction dynamic external fixator applied to subluxation of the proximal interphalangeal joint.

Fig. 3.

Medical photograph of a patient who applied distraction dynamic external fixator at 3 days after operation.

Fig. 4.

Medical photograph of a patient who applied distraction dynamic external fixator. Range of motion exercise was encouraged 3 to 5 days after surgery.

Fig. 5.

Medical photograph of a patient applied distraction dynamic external fixator at 5 weeks after operation.

Fig. 6.

Medical photograph of a patient applied distraction dynamic external fixator. The external fixator was removed after 5 weeks.

Table 1.

Demographics and Summary of the Results

Case No. Sex/Age (yr) Follow-up duration p Type of Fx Site of pin insertion Range of motion (o) Grasping power Complain of discomfort Complication Time of return to daily life (wk)
1 Female/41 11 mo LF MP base Fx MP, PP pin insertion 0–100 5 None None 4
2 Male/23 9 mo RF MP base Fx MP, PP pin insertion 0–100 5 None None 5
3 Male/48 8 wk IF MP base Fx PP head, MP shaft & head insertion 0–100 4 None None 5
4 Male/47 8 wk RF MP base Fx PP head, MP shaft & head insertion 0–100 4 None None 5
5 Male/24 3 mo RF MP base Fx MP, PP pin insertion 0–100 5 None None 4
6 Male/44 5 mo LF MP base Fx PP head, MP shaft & head insertion 0–100 4 None None 5
7 Male/36 3 mo RF MP base Fx PP head, MP shaft & head insertion 0–100 5 None None 5

Fx: fracture, LF: little finger, MP: middle phalanx, RF: ring finger, IF: index finger, PP: proximal phalanx.